1. FAIR argues that the benefits of Section 110 outweigh its costs, while Bronwyn Lance argues that its costs exceed the benefits. What costs and benefits of the legislation do both authors describe? Which do you think are most important?
2. Which of Kevin R. Johnson and Robert J. Samuelson’s arguments revolve around economic concerns? Which do not? Does one author emphasize economic matters more than the other? Do you believe economic interests should be the fundamental concern of immigration policy? Explain.
3. Mark Krikorian argues that there is a large gap between theory and reality over how “temporary protected status” is given to refugees, and suggests that the debate over refugee policy is dishonest because it ignores this fact? Could this criticism be applied to the viewpoint of the American Immigration Law Foundation, in your view? Defend your answer.