1. What important observation does Juror Two make about the testimony concerning the wound to the victim?
(a) He doubts that it would have taken a while for the victim to die.
(b) He doubts that it would be at a downward angle if inflicted by the defendant.
(c) He doubts that it could have been inflicted by the weapon presented.
(d) He doubts that it would be at an upward angle if inflicted by the defendant.

2. What is a hung jury?
(a) One in which the evidence is inconclusive.
(b) One in which the jurors cannot reach a unanimous verdict.
(c) One in which the foreman cannot control the jurors.
(d) One in which the jurors recommend hanging.

3. Which juror is able to clarify how the wound might have been made, based on his experience with many knife fights?
(a) Juror Three.
(b) Juror Ten.
(c) Juror Eight.
(d) Juror Five.

4. What significant information about the impact of an el train does the juror who used to live near it share?
(a) It does not run after dark.
(b) It is very noisy.
(c) It is very heavy.
(d) You cannot see clearly through the windows.

5. As Act II progresses, how does Juror Three's attitude contrast with the attitude of Juror Four?
(a) Juror Three has a closed mind while Juror Four is willing to listen and consider new possibilities.
(b) There is no contrast; they are both influenced by the belief that the defendant is guilty.
(c) Juror Three is irrational while Juror Four reasons out his contributions carefully.
(d) Juror Three is a bully; Juror four acts as if he has superior knowledge.