angry and says, “Thou also shalt wither like
a tree;” and “suddenly the boy withered
altogether” (Ap. Gos., p. 131). This
seems in thorough unity with the spirit Jesus showed
in later life, when he cursed the fig-tree, because
it did not bear fruit in the wrong season, and “presently
the fig-tree withered away” (Matt. xxi. 19).
Or a child, running against him purposely, falls dead;
or a master lifting his hand against him, has the arm
withered which essays to strike. Later, of Judas,
who betrays him, we read that, “falling headlong,
he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels
gushed out” (Acts i. 18); while, in the Old Testament,
which speaks of Christ, we are told, in figures, we
learn that, when Jeroboam tried to seize a prophet,
“his hand, which he put forth against him, dried
up, so that he could not pull it in again to him”
(1 Kings xiii. 4). If destructiveness be thought
injurious when related of Jesus, what shall we say
to the wanton destruction of the herd of swine which
Jesus filled with devils, and sent racing into the
sea? (Matt. viii. 28-34.) The miracle the child works
to rectify a mistake of his father’s in his
carpenter’s business, taking hold of some wood
which has been cut too short and lengthening it, is
certainly not more silly than the miracle worked by
the man when money is short, and he (Matt. xvii. 24-27)
sends Peter to catch a fish with money in its mouth
(why not, by the way, have fished directly for the
coin? it would be quite as possible for a coin to
transfix itself on a hook, as for a fish, with a piece
of money in its mouth, to swallow a hook). Other
miracles recorded in the apocryphal gospels, of healing
and of raising the dead, are identical in spirit with
those told of him in the canonical. We may also
remark that, unless there were some received traditions
of miracles worked by Jesus in his household, there
is no reason for the evident expectation of some help
which is said to have been shown by Mary when the guests
want wine at the wedding (John ii. 3-5). That
verse 11 states that this was his first miracle is
only one of the many inconsistencies of the gospel
stories. Passing from these gospels of the infancy
to those which tell of the sufferings of Jesus, we
shall find in the “Gospel of Nicodemus, or Acts
of Pilate,” much that shows their full accordance
with the received writings of the New Testament.
This point is so important, as equalising the canonical
and uncanonical gospels, that no excuse is needed for
proving it by somewhat extensive extracts. The
gospel opens as follows: “I, Ananias, a
provincial warden, being a disciple of the law, from
the divine Scriptures recognised our Lord Jesus Christ,
and came to him by faith; and was also accounted worthy
of holy baptism. Now, when searching the records
of what was wrought in the time of our Lord Jesus
Christ, which the Jews laid up under Pontius Pilate,
I found that these Acts were written in Hebrew, and
by the good pleasure of God I translated them into


