1. Why is it clear from the dissenting juror's action that anyone could have had a weapon similar to the murder weapon?
(a) He purchased it for $2.00 from a shop near the defendant's house.
(b) He purchased it for $10 from a hunting shop nearby.
(c) He borrowed it from a policeman who said they confiscate them from schoolboys all the time.
(d) He found it on the street.

2. What sentence must the defendant face if proven guilty?
(a) At least thirty years imprisonment.
(b) Life imprisonment with the possibility of parole.
(c) Life imprisonment without possibility of parole.
(d) The death penalty.

3. After the knife discussion, how do the other jurors pressure the dissenting juror to make him change his vote?
(a) They suggest that he is not intelligent enough to understand the evidence.
(b) They suggest that he is on the side of law breakers.
(c) They say he is the only one and they will return a "hung jury" verdict.
(d) They suggest that he is inferior because he is from the ghetto.

4. What is the defendant's alibi?
(a) He claims to have been at the movies.
(b) He claims to have been at the ball game.
(c) He claims to have been hanging out with his friends.
(d) He claims to have been at the store.

5. How does Juror Four challenge the defendant's alibi?
(a) The defendant can give no details about what he claims to have been doing.
(b) The ticket collector at the game does not remember the defendent
(c) The defendant cannot name the friend he was with.
(d) Noone saw the defendant.