Arguments in favor of the death penalty, including statements that show that statistics used by anti-death penalty groups are inaccurate.

Analyzes two famous U.S. Supreme Court cases, Gideon vs Wainright and Miranda vs. Arizona. Discusses the lasting impact each case had on U.S. law.

Explores Felony Murder law in Colorado, especially in relation to the Lisl Auman Case. Provides details of the case and describes how it demonstrates the hierarchy of the state law system.

Capital punishment is not an effective way to deter criminals. It is a violation of basic human rights, is not cost-effective, and does not prevent murders.

Essay provides an in-depth look at the issue of freedom of speech.

Free speech is a foundation of U.S. society, but the courts have ruled that it must be limited in order to prevent illegal acts. This can be seen in case histories about anti-black cross burnings by the Klu Klux Klan. This is not the case with flag burning because, the Supreme Court has ruled, this act does not present a clear and present danger to the public welfare and is, therefore, protected speech under the First Amendment.

The United States Constitution is based upon four principals: separation of powers, division of powers, checks and balances, and individual's rights and liberties.

The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth amendments to the U.S. Constitution were created using a valuable perspective on individual rights during the late eighteenth century. While the guidelines our forefathers used at that time should still apply today, the language should be updated to make the founders' words and concepts clearer and easier for modern society to understand. In addition, contemporary needs and technological advances necessitate that these amendments be updated and enhanced.

This essay evaluates some potentially unjust laws in America.