The following sections of this BookRags Literature Study Guide is offprint from Gale's For Students Series: Presenting Analysis, Context, and Criticism on Commonly Studied Works: Introduction, Author Biography, Plot Summary, Characters, Themes, Style, Historical Context, Critical Overview, Criticism and Critical Essays, Media Adaptations, Topics for Further Study, Compare & Contrast, What Do I Read Next?, For Further Study, and Sources.
(c)1998-2002; (c)2002 by Gale. Gale is an imprint of The Gale Group, Inc., a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Gale and Design and Thomson Learning are trademarks used herein under license.
The following sections, if they exist, are offprint from Beacham's Encyclopedia of Popular Fiction: "Social Concerns", "Thematic Overview", "Techniques", "Literary Precedents", "Key Questions", "Related Titles", "Adaptations", "Related Web Sites". (c)1994-2005, by Walton Beacham.
The following sections, if they exist, are offprint from Beacham's Guide to Literature for Young Adults: "About the Author", "Overview", "Setting", "Literary Qualities", "Social Sensitivity", "Topics for Discussion", "Ideas for Reports and Papers". (c)1994-2005, by Walton Beacham.
All other sections in this Literature Study Guide are owned and copyrighted by BookRags, Inc.
From Gilbert Ryle's death in 1976, and through the late 1990s, his views were not the focus of much philosophical attention. Studies of his thought have been published (e.g., Lyons 1980; Stroll 2001) and his character and role in Oxford have been illuminated by the memoirs of others (e.g., Mabbott 1986).
Ryle's own approach to the understanding of psychological concepts was superseded by the emergence of the psycho-physical identity theory, mainly because his analytical concentration on (behavioral) dispositions, of whatever complexity, seemed not to confer a sufficiently real status on lots of psychological processes, for example, feeling a pain or occurrent thinking.
His most lasting intellectual legacy has been the supposed distinction between knowing how and knowing that, which has remained part of philosophical folklore since he propounded it. According to Ryle knowing how to F is distinct from any knowledge that a proposition is true, amounting rather to a capacity to do the action in question. Ryle's distinction has been relied on by those (e.g., David Lewis) who have tried, when answering certain antimaterialist arguments, to give a practical, nonfactualist account of knowing what an experience is like. However, considerable skepticism is being generated about Ryle's distinction (e.g., in Stanley and Williamson 2001; Snowdon 2003). Thus, someone who is injured can know how to do something even though he or she is unable to do it, and much knowhow seems to be knowledge that some way is the way to act. These criticisms have been resisted (e.g., Koethe 2002; Rumfit 2003). There is considerable debate and it remains to be seen whether this aspect of Ryle's thought will suffer the fate of the rest.
Koethe, J. "Stanley and Williamson on Knowing How." Journal of Philosophy 94 (2002): 325–328.
Mabbott, J. D. Oxford Memories. Oxford: Thorntons, 1986.
Rumfit, I. "Savoir Faire." Journal of Philosophy 100 (2003): 158–166.
Snowdon, Paul F. "Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1) (2003): 1–29.
Stanley, Jason, and Tim Williamson. "Knowing How." Journal of Philosophy 98 (2001): 411–444.
Lyons, William. Gilbert Ryle: An Introduction to His Philosophy. Brighton, U.K.: Harvester Press, 1980.
Stroll, Avrum. "Gilbert Ryle." In A Companion to Analytic Philosophy, edited by A. P. Martinich and David Sosa. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.