I said in the Chamber of Deputies, and I feel pleasure in repeating here, that the plan of the ‘Senatus-consults’, which Bonaparte dictated to me, excepted from restitution only such mansions as were used for public establishments.  These he would neither surrender nor pay rent for.  With those exceptions he was willing to restore almost all that was possessed by the State and had not been sold.

The First Consul, as soon as he had finished this plan of a decree, convoked a Grand Council to submit it to their consideration.  I was in an adjoining room to that in which they met, and as the deliberations were carried on with great warmth, the members talking very loudly, sometimes even vociferating, I heard all that passed.  The revolutionary party rejected all propositions of restitution.  They were willing to call back their victims, but they would not part with the spoil.

When the First Consul returned to his cabinet, dissatisfied with the ill success of his project, I took the liberty of saying to him, “you cannot but perceive, General, that your object has been defeated, and your project unsuccessful.  The refusal to restore to the emigrants all that the State possesses takes from the recall all its generosity and dignity of character.  I wonder how you could yield to such an unreasonable and selfish opposition.”—­“The revolutionary party,” replied he, “had the majority in the Council.  What could I do?  Am I strong enough to overcome all those obstacles?”—­” General, you can revive the question again, and oppose the party you speak of.”—­“That would be difficult,” he said; “they still have a high hand in these matters.  Time is required.  However, nothing is definitively arranged.  We shall see what can be done.”  The ‘Senatus-consulte’, published on the 6th Floreal, year X. (26th of April 1802), a fortnight after the above conversation took place, is well known.  Bonaparte was then obliged to yield to the revolutionary party, or he would have adhered to his first proposition.

—­[The Senatus-consulte retained the woods and forests of the emigrants, and made their recall an “amnesty.”  In the end this retention of the forests was used by Napoleon with great dexterity as a means of placing them under personal obligation to him for restoring this species of property.  See Thiers tome iii, p. 458, livre xiv.]—­

Napoleon referred to this matter at St. Helena.  He himself says that he “would have been able” (he should have said that he wished) to grant everything, that for a moment he thought of doing so, and that it was a mistake not to do so.  “This limitation on my part,” he adds, “destroyed all the good effect of the return of the emigrants.  The mistake was the greater since I thought of doing it, but I was alone, surrounded by oppositions and by spies:  all were against your party, you cannot easily picture the matter to yourself, but important affairs hurried me, time pressed, and I was obliged to act differently.”  Afterwards he speaks of a syndicate he wished to form, but I have never heard a word of that.  I have said how things really happened, and what has been just read confirms this.