a loom or a bowsprit, than of any other object the
most remote from their habits and pursuits.”
Through tradition, fashion and deliberation, they
are, and wish only to be, people of society; their
sole concern is to talk and to hunt. Never have
the leaders of men so unlearned the art of leading
men; the art which consists of marching along the
same pathway with them, but at the head, and directing
their labor by sharing in it. — Our Englishman,
an eye-witness and competent, again writes: “Thus
it is whenever you stumble on a grand seignior, even
one that was worth millions, you are sure to find
his property desert. Those of the Duc de Bouillon
and of the Prince de Soubise are two of the greatest
properties in France; and all the signs I have yet
seen of their greatness are heaths, moors, deserts,
and brackens. Go to their residence, wherever
it may be, and you would probably find them in the
midst of a forest very well peopled with deer, wild
boars and wolves.” “The great proprietors,”
says another contemporary,[40] “attracted to
and kept in our cities by luxurious enjoyments know
nothing of their estates,” save “of their
agents whom they harass for the support of a ruinous
ostentation. How can ameliorations be looked
for from those who even refuse to keep things up and
make indispensable repairs?” A sure proof that
their absence is the cause of the evil is found in
the visible difference between the domain worked under
absent abbé-commendatory and a domain superintended
by monks living on the spot “The intelligent
traveler recognizes it” at first sight by the
state of cultivation. “If he finds fields
well enclosed by ditches, carefully planted, and covered
with rich crops, these fields, he says to himself;
belong to the monks. Almost always, alongside
of these fertile plains, is an area of ground badly
tilled and almost barren, presenting a painful contrast;
and yet the soil is the same, being two portions of
the same domain; he sees that the latter is the portion
of the abbé-commendatory.” “The abbatial
manse.” said Lefranc de Pompignan, “frequently
looks like the property of a spendthrift; the monastic
manse is like a patrimony whereon nothing is neglected
for its amelioration,” to such an extent that
" the two-thirds " which the abbé enjoys bring him
less than the third reserved by his monks. —
The ruin or impoverishment of agriculture is, again,
one of the effects of absenteeism. There was,
perhaps, one-third of the soil in France, which, deserted
as in Ireland, was as badly tilled, as little productive
as in Ireland in the hands of the rich absentees, the
English bishops, deans and nobles.


