As we have frequently mentioned Grotius, the short account of so great a man, which is inserted in Langbaine, will not be unpleasing to the reader.

“Hugo Grotius, says he, was an honour to his country:  he was born in the year 1583, and will be famous to posterity, in regard of those many excellent pieces he has published.  In some of his writings he defended Arminianism, for which he suffered imprisonment in the castle of Louverstein, in the year 1618; at which time his associate Barnevelt lost his head on the same account.  Afterwards Grotius escaped out of prison, by means of Maria Reigersberg his wife, and fled into Flanders; and thence into France, where he was kindly received by Lewis xiii.  He died at Rostock in Mecclebourg, Sept. 1, 1645.  His life is written at large by Melchoir Adamus, in Latin.”

As to our outhor’s [sic] translation, which is in heroic verse, it is much commended by verses from four of his friends.

He also translated Grotius’s consolatory oration to his father, with epitaphs; and also his Catechism into English verse.

Mr. Goldsmith died at Ashton in Northamptonshire, in September 1655, and was buried there, leaving behind him an only daughter named Katherine, afterwards the wife of Sir Henry Dacres.

Footnote: 
1.  Wood Athen.  Oxon. v. 2. p. 194.

* * * * *

JohnCleveland,

Was the son of a vicar of Hinkley, in Leicestershire, where he was born, and received his grammatical education, under one Mr. Richard Vines, a zealous Puritan.  After he had compleated his school education, he was sent to Christ’s College in Cambridge, and in a short time distinguishing himself for his knowledge of the Latin tongue, and for Oratory, he was preferred to a fellowship in St. John’s-College, in the said university.  He continued there about nine years, and made during that time some successful attempts in poetry.  At length, upon the eruption of the civil war, he was the first who espoused the Royal cause in verse, against the Presbyterians, who persecuted him in their turn with more solid severity; for he was ejected, as soon as the reins of power were in their hands.  Dr. Fuller bestows upon our author the most lavish panegyric:  He was (says he) a general artist, pure latinist, an exquisite orator, and what was his masterpiece, an eminent poet.  Dr. Fuller thus characterizes him, but as Cleveland has not left remains behind him sufficient to convey to posterity so high an idea of his merit, it may be supposed that the Doctor spoke thus in his favour, meerly on account of their agreement in political principles.  He addressed an oration, says Winstanley, to Charles I. who was so well pleased with it, that he sent for him, and gave him his hand to kiss, with great expressions of kindness.  When Oliver Cromwell was in election to be member for the town of Cambridge, as he engaged all his friends and interests to oppose