Unstudied from his pen; not like a spell
  Big with mysterious words, such as inchant
  The half-witted, and confound the ignorant. 
  Then, what must needs, afflict the amourist,
  No virgin here, in breeches casts a mist
  Before her lover’s eyes; no ladies tell
  How their blood boils, how high their veins do swell. 
  But what is worse no baudy mirth is here;
  (The wit of bottle-ale, and double beer)
  To make the wife of citizen protest,
  And country justice swear ’twas a good jest. 
  Now, Sirs, you have the errors of his wit,
  Like, or dislike, at your own perils be’t.

Footnote: 
1.  Wood Athen.  Oxon. v. 1, p, 100.

* * * * *

FrancisGoldsmith.

Was the son of Francis Goldsmith, of St. Giles in the Fields in Middlesex, Esq; was educated under Dr. Nicholas Grey, in Merchant-Taylor’s School, became a gentleman commoner in Pembroke-College in the beginning of 1629, was soon after translated to St. John’s College, and after he had taken a degree in arts, to Grey’s-Inn, where he studied the common law several years, but other learning more[1].  Mr. Langbaine says, that he could recover no other memoirs of this gentleman, but that he lived in the reign of King Charles the First, and obliged the World with a translation of a play out of Latin called, Sophompaneas, or the History of Joseph, with Annotations, a Tragedy, printed 4to.  Lond. 1640, and dedicated to the Right Hon. Henry Lord Marquis of Dorchester.  This Drama was written by the admirable Hugo Grotius, published by him at Amsterdam 1635, and dedicated to Vossius, Professor of History and Civil Arts in Amsterdam.  He stiles it a Tragedy, notwithstanding it ends successfully, and quotes for his authority in so doing, AEschilus, Euripides, and even Vossius, in his own Art of Poetry.  Some make it a Question, whether it be lawful to found a dramatic Poem on any sacred subject, and some people of tender consciences have murmured against this Play, and another of the same cast called Christ’s Passion; but let us hear the opinion of Vossius himself, prefixed to this Play.  “I am of opinion, (says he) it is better to chuse another argument than sacred.  For it agrees not with the majesty of sacred things, to be made a play and a fable.  It is also a work of very dangerous consequence, to mingle human inventions with things sacred; because the poet adds uncertainties of his own, sometimes falsities; which is not only to play with holy things, but also to graft in men’s minds opinions, now and then false.  These things have place, especially when we bring in God, or Christ speaking, or treating of the mysteries of religion.  I will allow more where the history is taken out of the sacred scriptures; but yet in the nature of the argument is civil, as the action of David flying from his son Absolom; or of Joseph sold by his brethren, advanced by Pharaoh to the government of Egypt, and that dignity adored by, and made known unto his brethren.  Of which argument is Sophompaneas, written by Hugo Grotius, embassador from the Queen of Sweden to the King of France; which tragedy, I suppose, may be set for a pattern to him, that would handle an argument from the holy scriptures.”  This is the opinion of Vossius, and with him all must agree who admire the truly admirable Samson Agonistes of Milton.