Methode, methodicall, placation, function, assubriling,
refining, compendious, prolixe, figuratiue, inueigle.
A terme borrowed of our common Lawyers,
impression,
also a new terme, but well expressing the matter, and
more than our English word. These words,
Numerous,
numerositee, metricall, harmonicall, but they
cannot be refused, specially in this place for description
of the arte. Also ye finde these words,
penetrate,
penetrable, indignitie, which I cannot see how
we may spare them, whatsoeuer fault wee finde with
Ink-horne termes: for our speach wanteth words
to such sense so well to be vsed: yet in steade
of
indignitie, yee haue vnworthinesse:
and for
penetrate, we may say
peerce,
and that a French terme also, or
broche, or
enter into with violence, but not so well sounding
as
penetrate. Item,
sauage, for
wilde:
obscure, for darke. Item these
words,
declamation, delineation, dimention,
are scholasticall termes in deede, and yet very proper.
But peraduenture (& I could bring a reason for it)
many other like words borrowed out of the Latin and
French, were not so well to be be allowed by vs, as
these words,
audacious, for bold:
facunditie,
for eloquence,
egregious, for great or notable:
implete, for replenished;
attemptat,
for attempt:
compatible, for agreeable
in nature, and many more. But herein the noble
Poet
Horace hath said inough to satisfie vs
all in these few verses.
Multa renascentur quae iam cecidere
cadentque
Quae nunc sunt in honore vocabula si volet
usus
Quem penes artibrium est et ius et norma
loquendi.
Which I haue thus englished, but nothing with so good
grace, nor so briefly as the Poet wrote.
Many a word if able shall est arise
And such as now bene held in hiest prise
Will fall as fast, when vse and custome
will
Onely vmpiers of speach, for force and
skill.
CHAP. V.
Of Stile.
Stile is a constant & continuall phrase or tenour
of speaking and writing, extending to the whole tale
or processe of the poeme or historie, and not properly
to any peece or member of a tale: but is of words
speeches and sentences together, a certaine contriued
forme and qualitie, many times naturall to the writer,
many times his peculier by election and arte, and
such as either he keepeth by skill, or holdeth on by
ignorance, and will not or peraduenture cannot easily
alter into any other. So we say that Ciceros
stile and Salusts were not one, nor Cesars
and Linies, nor Homers and Hesiodus,
nor Herodotus and Theucidides, nor Euripides
& Aristophones, nor Erasmus and Budeus
stiles. And because this continuall course and
manner of writing or speech sheweth the matter and
disposition of the writers minde, more than one or