[576] “My affair had some bounds assigned to it by him who sent for me up, but is now protracted by intricate and wily examinations, as if it would never find a period; while sometimes one person, sometimes another, ask me questions, without limit and without end.”—­Latimer to the Archbishop of Canterbury:  Remains, p. 352.

[577] Remains, p. 222.

[578] Sermons, p. 294.

[579] The process lasted through January, February, and March.

[580] Sermons, p. 294.

[581] He subscribed all except two—­one apparently on the power of the pope, the other I am unable to conjecture.  Compare the Articles themselves—­printed in LATIMER’S Remains, p. 466—­with the Sermon before the Convocation.—­Sermons, p. 46; and BURNET, vol. iii. p. 116.

[582] Nicholas Glossop to Cromwell:  ELLIS, third series, vol. ii. p. 237.

[583] Where he was known among the English of the day as Master Frisky-all.

[584] See FOXE. vol. v. p. 392.

[585] Eustace Chappuys to Chancellor Granvelle:  MS. Archiv.  Brussels:  Pilgrim, p. 106.

[586] See Cromwell’s will in an appendix to this chapter.  This document, lately found in the Rolls House, furnishes a clue at last to the connections of the Cromwell family.

[587] Are we to believe Foxe’s story that Cromwell was with the Duke of Bourbon at the storming of Rome in May, 1527?  See FOXE, vol. v. p. 365.  He was with Wolsey in January, 1527.  See ELLIS, third series, vol. ii. p. 117.  And he was again with him early in 1528.  Is it likely that he was in Italy on such an occasion in the interval?  Foxe speaks of it as one of the random exploits of Cromwell’s youth, which is obviously untrue; and the natural impression which we gather is, that he was confusing the expedition of the Duke of Bourbon with some earlier campaign.  On the other hand Foxe’s authority was Cranmer, who was likely to know the truth; and it is not impossible that, in the critical state of Italian politics, the English government might have desired to have some confidential agent in the Duke of Bourbon’s camp.  Cromwell, with his knowledge of Italy and Italian, and his adventurous ability, was a likely man to have been sent on such an employment; and the story gains additional probability from another legend about him, that he once saved the life of Sir John Russell, in some secret affair at Bologna.  See FOXE, vol. v. p. 367.  Now, although Sir John Russell had been in Italy several times before (he was at the Battle of Pavia, and had been employed in various diplomatic missions), and Cromwell might thus have rendered him the service in question on an earlier occasion, yet he certainly was in the Papal States, on a most secret and dangerous mission, in the months preceding the capture of Rome. State Papers, vol. vi. p. 560, etc.  The probabilities may pass for what they are worth till further discovery.