saw the like of. He who cuts down a tree must
take forethought how it may fall, or he will perchance
find himself crushed. He who in a tremendous
conflagration would blow up a block of houses with
powder, must, even amid the riot and roar, so manage
the explosion that lives be not wantonly lost.
We must clear the chips away as our work advances.
The matter in hand is the war—if you choose,
nothing but the war. But pushing on singly and
simply at the war implies some wisdom
and a certain regard to the future and to consequences.
The mere abolitionist of the old school, who regards
the Constitution as a league with death and a covenant
with hell, may, if he pleases, see in the war only
an opportunity to wreak vengeance on the South and
free the black. But the ‘emancipationist’
sees this in a very different light. He sees
that we are not fighting for the Negro, or
out of hatred to anybody. He knows that we are
fighting to restore the Union, and that this is the
first great thought, to be carried out at all
hazards. But he feels that this carrying out involves
some action at the same time on the great trouble
which first caused the war, and which, if neglected,
will prolong the war forever. He feels that the
future of the greatest republic in existence depends
on settling this question now and forever, and that
if it be left to the chances of war to settle itself,
there is imminent danger that even a victory may not
prevent a disrupture of the Union. For, disguise
it as we may, there is a vast and uncontrollable body
at the North who hate slavery, and pity the black,
and these men will not be silent or inactive.
Did the election of Abraham Lincoln involve nothing
of this? We know that it did. Will this
‘extreme left,’ this radical party, keep
quiet and do nothing? Why they are the most fiercely
active men on our continent. Let him who would
prevent this battle degenerating into a furious strife
between radical abolition and its opponents weigh this
matter well. There are fearful elements at work,
which may be neutralized, if we who fight for the
Union will be wise betimes, and remove the bone
of contention.
Above all, let every man bear in mind that, even as the war stands, something must be done to regulate and settle the Negro question. After what has been already effected in the border States and South Carolina, it would be impossible to leave the Negro and his owner in such an undefined relation as now exists. And yet this very fact—one of the strongest which can be alleged to prove the necessity of legislation and order—is cited to prove that the matter will settle itself. Take, for instance, the following from the correspondence of a daily cotemporary:—


