To such an extent is this arrogance carried of urging utter silence at present on the subject of slavery, that one might almost question whether the right of free speech or thought is to be left at all, save to those who have determined on a certain course of conduct.  When it is remembered that those who wish to definitely conclude this great national trouble are in the great majority, we stand amazed at the presumption which forbids them to utter a word.  One may almost distrust his senses to hear it so brazenly urged that because he happens to think that our fighting and victories may go hand in hand with a measure which is to prevent future war, he is ‘opposed to the Administration,’ is ’a selfish traitor thinking of nothing but the Nigger,’ and altogether a stumbling-block and an untimely meddler.  If he protest that he cares no more for the welfare of the Negro than for that of the man in the moon, he is still reviled as an ‘abolitionist.’  If he insist that emancipation will end the war, his ‘conservative’ foe becomes pathetic over his indifference as to what is to become of the four millions of ’poor blacks.’  And, in short, when he urges the great question whether this country is to tolerate slavery or no, he is met with trivial fribbling side-issues, every one of which should vanish like foam before the determined will and onward march of a great, free people.

Now let every friend of the Union boldly assume that so far as the settlement of this question is concerned he does not care one straw for the Negro.  Leave the Negro out altogether.  Let him sink or swim, so far as this difficulty goes.  Men have tried for thirty years to appeal to humanity, without success, for the Negro, and now let us try some other expedient.  Let us regard him not as a man and a brother, but as ’a miserable nigger,’ if you please, and a nuisance.  But whatever he be, if the effect of owning such creatures is to make the owner an intolerable fellow, seditious and insolent, it becomes pretty clear that such ownership should be put an end to.  If Mr. Smith can not have a horse without riding over his neighbor, it is quite time that Smith were unhorsed, no matter how honestly he may have acquired the animal.  And if the Smiths, father and sons, threaten to keep their horse in spite of law,—­nay, and breed up a race of horses from him, whereon to roughride everybody who goes afoot,—­then it becomes still more imperative that the Smith family cease cavaliering it altogether.

There is yet another point which the stanch Union-lover must keep in view.  In pushing on the war with heart and soul, we inevitably render slaveholding at any rate a most precarious institution, and one likely to be broken up altogether.  Seeing this, many unreflectingly ask, ’Why then meddle with it?’ But it must be considered in some way, and provided for as the war advances, or we shall find ourselves in such an imbroglio as history never