faith by their idolatry. But would this be true?
Has Christianity anything to dread? What impression
has the Joss-House made all these years on the life
of San Francisco outside of Chinatown? None whatever,
except to make the reflecting man value the Christian
faith with its elevating influences and its blessed
hopes all the more. It is a mistake then to exclude
Chinamen from our shores on the ground that they will
do harm to Christianity. On the contrary the
Church will do them good. The Gospel is the leaven
which will be the salvation of heathen men. Did
it not go forth into the Gentile world on its glorious
mission, and did it not convert many nations in the
first ages? Has it lost its potency to-day?
No! It is as powerful as ever to win men from
their idols and their evil lives. The question
of Chinese immigration is a large one. It has
its social and its political aspects. It is found
all along the Pacific coast that Chinamen make good
and faithful servants. The outcry against them
as competing with white laborers and artisans is more
the result of political agitation for political purposes
than good judgment. Where they have been displaced
on farms, in mills, in warehouses, in domestic life,
white men and women have not been found to take their
places and do the work which they can do so well.
Under the Geary Act immigration has been restricted
and the numbers of the Chinese in the United States
have been gradually decreasing. In the year 1854
there were only 3,000 Chinese in the City of San Francisco;
but even then there was agitation against them.
It was Governor Bigler who called them “coolies,”
and this term they repudiated with the same abhorrence
which the negro or black man has for the term “nigger.”
They kept on increasing, however, until in 1875 there
were in the whole State of California 130,000.
Of this number 30,000 were in San Francisco.
To-day there are only about 46,000 in California and
there are not more than thirty thousand of these in
the City of San Francisco. There are only 110,000
Chinese altogether in the United States proper.
Even the most ardent exclusionist can see from this
that there is nothing to dread as to an overwhelming
influx that will threaten the integrity and existence
of our civilisation. The labour-question and the
race-question and the international question, aroused
by the presence of the Chinese within our borders,
will from time to time cause agitation and provoke
discussion and heated debate and evoke oratory of
one kind or another; but the question which should
be uppermost in the minds of wise statesmen is how
shall they be assimilated to our life? How shall
we make them Christians? The answer will be the
best solution of the whole matter, if it has in mind
the spiritual interests of the Chinaman and of all
other heathen on our shores. There is indeed
a plague spot in Chinatown, the social fester, which
can and ought to be removed. But this is true
of American San Francisco as well as of Chinatown.


