(2) the square bas-reliefs on either side of entrance, (3) deeply-recessed double arcading, (4) sculptured capitals, (5) parvise.  If on entering the church the visitor will at once take his stand beneath the central tower, and looking N. and S. down the transepts, E. as far as the throne, and W. to the porch by which he entered, can picture the E. end closed by an apse and the church lighted by narrow lancets, and can further imagine the absence of the organ-screen and the unsightly inverted arches, he will have a very fair idea of what the church looked like when it left the hands of its first builder, Bishop Robert, in 1166.  The nave was carried westwards to its present limits in 1174-91 by his successor, Bishop Reginald, and to this Bishop Joceline added the W. front, built the E. cloister, and consecrated the whole edifice in October 1239.  The architecture of the nave has been aptly described as “improved Norman.”  Its peculiarities are assigned to the idiosyncrasies of local builders.  The general effect is a certain monotonous severity, and the absence of vaulting shafts gives the building a tunnel-like appearance.  The inverted arches are disguised struts inserted in 1338 to prevent the collapse of the central tower.  They give, it is true, character to the interior, but their effect is ungainly.  Bishop Robert’s work can be distinguished from his successor’s by the larger stones employed, the transverse tooling (as if done by an adze), and the existence of grotesques in the tympanum of the arches of the triforium.  Note in nave (1) humorous figures on capitals of arcade, (2) cinque cento glass in central light of W. window (an importation), (3) the Perp. arches on each side of tower archway, (4) the beautiful chantries, on N. of Bishop Bubwith, on S. of Hugh Sugar (the details will repay study), (5) chapels under W. towers, (6) ugly pulpit, given by Bishop Knight in 1540, (7) above S. arcade, Perp. minstrels’ gallery and projecting heads of a king with a falling lad and a bishop with children.  They may have been the support of a small organ, but the local wiseacres were accustomed to declare that they were intended as prophecies of the evil days which should befall the church when a king should have a weakling for his heir and Wells should receive as its bishop a married man.  These predictions were held to be fulfilled when Henry VIII., whose heir was Edward VI., nominated to the see Bishop Barlow.  In N. transept note curious astronomical clock, which strikes the hours by a clumsy representation of a tournament.  It was originally constructed for Glastonbury Abbey by P. Lightfoot, one of the monks.  In S. transept note (1) vigorous grotesques on capitals, (2) font, perhaps pre-Norm.  The visitor should now pay the customary 6d. and seek admission to the choir.  Historically, both lady chapel and chapter house preceded the present choir; but the custodian’s custom is to show the choir first.  As it stands it was the work of Bishop Ralph in 1329-63, who reconstructed