characteristics of the French, is now comparatively
disregarded. The people who receive what they
earn in a currency they hold in contempt, are more
anxious to spend than to save; and those who formerly
hoarded six liards or twelve sols pieces with great
care, would think it folly to hoard an assignat, whatever
its nominal value. Hence the lower class of
females dissipate their wages on useless finery; men
frequent public-houses, and game for larger sums than
before; little shopkeepers, instead of amassing their
profits, become more luxurious in their table:
public places are always full; and those who used,
in a dress becoming their station, to occupy the “parquet”
or “parterre,” now, decorated with paste,
pins, gauze, and galloon, fill the boxes:—and
all this destructive prodigality is excused to others
and themselves "par ce que ce n’est que du
papier." [Because it is only paper.]—It
is vain to persuade them to oeconomize what they think
a few weeks may render valueless; and such is the
evil of a circulation so totally discredited, that
profusion assumes the merit of precaution, extravagance
the plea of necessity, and those who were not lavish
by habit become so through their eagerness to part
with their paper. The buried gold and silver
will again be brought forth, and the merchant and the
politician forget the mischief of the assignats.
But what can compensate for the injury done to the
people? What is to restore their ancient frugality,
or banish their acquired wants? It is not to
be expected that the return of specie will diminish
the inclination for luxury, or that the human mind
can be regulated by the national finance; on the contrary,
it is rather to be feared, that habits of expence
which owe their introduction to the paper will remain
when the paper is annihilated; that, though money
may become more scarce, the propensities of which it
supplies the indulgence will not be less forcible,
and that those who have no other resources for their
accustomed gratifications will but too often find
one in the sacrifice of their integrity.—Thus,
the corruption of manners will be succeeded by the
corruption of morals, and the dishonesty of one sex,
with the licentiousness of the other, produce consequences
much worse than any imagined by the abstracted calculations
of the politician, or the selfish ones of the merchant.
Age will be often without solace, sickness without
alleviation, and infancy without support; because
some would not amass for themselves, nor others for
their children, the profits of their labour in a representative
sign of uncertain value.
I do not pretend to assert that these are the natural effects of a paper circulation—doubtless, when supported by high credit, and an extensive commerce, it must have many advantages; but this was not the case in France—the measure was adopted in a moment of revolution, and when the credit of the country, never very considerable, was precarious and degraded—It did not flow from the exuberance


