The Grammar of English Grammars eBook

Goold Brown
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 4,149 pages of information about The Grammar of English Grammars.

The Grammar of English Grammars eBook

Goold Brown
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 4,149 pages of information about The Grammar of English Grammars.

Weight, measure, &c., see Time.

Wert, as used in lieu of wast
    —­its mood not easy to determine; authorities for a various use of.

What, its class and nature
    —­to what usually applied; its twofold relat. explained
    —­its numb.; example of solec. in the use of
    —­as a mere adj., or as a pron. indef.
    —­its use both as an adj. and as a relative at the same time; do. for
      who or which, ludic. and vulg.
    —­declined
    —­how to be disposed of in etymolog. parsing; how to be parsed
      syntactically
    —­how becomes an interj.
    —­used appar. for an adv.; uttered exclamatorily before an adj., to be
      taken as an adj., ("WHAT PARTIAL judges are our,” &c.,)
    —­followed by that, by way of pleonasm, ("WHAT I tell you in
      darkness
, THAT,” &c.,)
    —­with but preceding, ("To find a friend, BUT WHAT” &c.,)
    —­vulg. use of, for that
    —­derivation of, from Sax., shown.

Whatever or whatsoever, its peculiarities of construe., the same as
those of what; its use in simp, relation
    —­its construc. as a double relative; whether it may be supposed
      ellipt.
    —­its declension.

When, where, or while, in what instance not fit to follow the verb is
    —­When, where, whither, as partaking of the nature of a pron.;
      construc, of do., with antecedent nouns of time, &c., how far
      allowable
    —­derivation of, from Anglo-Sax.

Whether, as an interrog. pron.; as a disjunc. conjunc.
    —­conjunc. corresponsive to or
    —­as do., its derivation from Sax.

Which, relative
    —­its former use; to what objects now confined
    —­its use after a personal term taken by meton. for a thing; do., as
      still applicable to persons
    —­is of all the genders, (in oppos. to MURR., WEBST., et. al.,)
    —­is less approp. than who, in all personifications
    —­its construc. when taken in its discrim. sense,
    —­how differs from the rel. that
    —­BLAIR’S incorrect remarks respecting
    —­Which, as rel. or interrog., declined
    —­Which, sometimes takes whose for its poss.,
    —­represents a prop. name taken merely as a name, ("Herod
    —­WHICH is but,” &c.,)
    —­do. nouns of mult, expressing persons, when such are strictly of the
      neut. gend., ("The COMMITTEES WHICH” &c.,)
    —­in what cases is less approp. than that
    —­does not fitly represent an indicative assertion, (’"Be ATTENTIVE,
      without WHICH,” &c.,)
    —­its Sax. derivation shown
    —­The which, obsol.,
    —­Which, interrog., what demands,
    —­to what objects applied
    —­now used for the obsol. whether.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
The Grammar of English Grammars from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.