A Political Diary 1828-1830, Volume II eBook

Edward Law, 1st Earl of Ellenborough
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 397 pages of information about A Political Diary 1828-1830, Volume II.

A Political Diary 1828-1830, Volume II eBook

Edward Law, 1st Earl of Ellenborough
This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 397 pages of information about A Political Diary 1828-1830, Volume II.

The division last night in the House of Commons on Lord J. Russell’s motion for giving two members to Manchester, Birmingham, and Leeds, was not satisfactory.  There were 140 for it, and only 188 against it.  The Tories stayed away.

February 25.

House at 4 and until 2.  Lord Stanhope’s motion for a Committee of the whole House on the internal state of the country.  He made a weak speech, because to get votes he abstained from stating the cause of distress, which in his opinion is currency, or any remedy.  Goderich and Lansdowne made good speeches.  Rosebery not a bad one, though as usual pompous.  All suggesting some remedies—­all for reducing taxation, but against a Committee of the House.  Lord Radnor made a good vulgar speech.  King spoke better than usual.  He proposed, but afterwards withdrew, an amendment for a Committee upstairs.  The Duke, who alone spoke on our side, did not speak well, and some of his statements were hazardous.  Lords Darnley and Bute declared there was no distress near them.

We divided well.  There being but fifteen present for Lord Stanhope’s motion, and ten proxies.

February 26.

Chairs at 11.  Went over with them the letter on Batta.

Lord Wharncliffe intends on Tuesday to propose examining the Chairman of the East Indian Company.

February 27.

Wrote a note to Loch to tell him of Lord Wharncliffe’s intention.  He does not like the idea at all, and wishes to see me before the Committee sits.  I have named Monday at eleven.  I told him my feeling was against his being examined, as I thought it unfair; besides, he was not the best witness.  I told Lord Wharncliffe he should examine Lord Amherst.

At the Cabinet room I attempted to read the papers respecting Irish education.  My opinion is that it would be better to let the matter rest for the present; the agitation of it may revive animosities, and if any good be attainable, it may be attained at a more favourable period than the present.  I rather doubt whether it might not be yet more safely left to the people themselves, as education in England and in Scotland.

March 1.

Cabinet.  We were to have talked about Irish education, but more important matters intervened.  There is a motion on Friday of Mr. Davenport’s for a Committee on the internal state of the country.  Peel thinks there will be a union of parties in favour of it.  He feels it must be opposed.  Some of the friends of Government have said they must vote for it.  He proposes that Goulburn should to-morrow give notice of his intention of explaining his views as to taxation on Monday week.  Peel thinks that he can procure an adjournment of the debate till after Goulburn’s expose.

Goulburn suggests taking off the whole of the beer tax, and remitting the hop duty for this year, as well as remodelling it.  He likewise proposes lowering the duties on East and West India sugar, the former from 37_s_. to 25_s_., and the latter from 27_s_. to 20_s_.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
A Political Diary 1828-1830, Volume II from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.