The Talent Oligopoly - Research Article from History of the American Cinema

This encyclopedia article consists of approximately 38 pages of information about The Talent Oligopoly.

The Talent Oligopoly - Research Article from History of the American Cinema

This encyclopedia article consists of approximately 38 pages of information about The Talent Oligopoly.
This section contains 11,195 words
(approx. 38 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy The Talent Oligopoly Encyclopedia Article

The industry's evolution during the 1980s concealed a paradox. Complicating their drive to keep all revenue streams in-house, the majors failed to control a vitally important resource-the talent required for making films. During the 1930s and 1940s, the major studio-distributors maintained repositories of in-house talent that they kept under long-term contract. Such an arrangement assured relatively stable relations with the personnel needed for production, and the old-line studio moguls treated most of their directors, screenwriters, and actors like what they were-studio employees. As producer Bernie Brillstein noted, "When Spencer Tracy [under contract to MGM's Louis B. Mayer] wanted to make a movie for Columbia, lie had to beg Mayer to let him".1

By contrast, in the 1980s the majors labored under the constraints that had prevailed since the 1947 divestiture ruling and the industry changes that it helped to instigate. Chief among these were the...

(read more)

This section contains 11,195 words
(approx. 38 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy The Talent Oligopoly Encyclopedia Article
Copyrights
Gale
The Talent Oligopoly from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.