Forgot your password?  

Not What You Meant?  There are 35 definitions for Atom.  Also try: Farley or Nuclear or Nuke or Nuklear power.

Nuclear Power | Research & Encyclopedia Articles

Print-Friendly   Order the PDF version   Order the RTF version
About 7 pages (1,997 words)
Nuclear power Summary

Purchase our Nuclear Power


Nuclear Power

Nuclear power is any method of doing work that makes use of nuclear fission or fusion reactions. In its broadest sense, the term refers to both the uncontrolled release of energy, as in fission or fusion weapons, and to the controlled release of energy, as in a nuclear power plant. Most commonly, however, the expression nuclear power is reserved for the latter of these two instances.

The world's first exposure to nuclear power came with the detonation of two fission ("atomic") bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, events that help bring World War II to a conclusion. A number of scientists and laypersons perceived an optimistic aspect of these terrible events. They hoped that the power of nuclear energy could be harnessed to do much of the work that all human societies face. Those hopes have been realized to only a modest degree, however. Some serious problems associated with the use of nuclear power have never been satisfactorily solved and, after three decades of progress in the development of controlled nuclear power, interest in this energy source has leveled off and, in many nations, declined.

A nuclear power plant is a system in which energy released by fission reactions is captured and used for the generation of electricity. Every such plant contains four fundamental elements: the reactor, coolant system, electrical power generating unit, and the safety system.

The source of energy in a nuclear reactor is a fission reaction in which neutrons collide with nuclei of uranium-235 or plutonium-239 (the fuel), causing them to split apart. The products of any fission reaction include not only huge amounts of energy, but also waste products, known as fission products, and additional neutrons. A constant and reliable flow of neutrons is insured in the reactor by means of a moderator, which slows down the speed of neutrons, and control rods, which control the number of neutrons available in the reactor and, hence, the rate at which fission can occur.

Energy produced in the reactor is carried away by means of a coolant, a fluid such as water, liquid sodium, or carbon dioxide gas. The fluid absorbs heat from the reactor and then begins to boil itself or to cause water in a secondary system to boil. Steam produced in either of these ways is then piped into the electrical generating unit where it turns the blades of a turbine. The turbine, in turn, powers a generator that produces electrical energy.

The high cost of constructing a modern nuclear power plant reflects in part the enormous range of safety features needed to protect against various possible mishaps. Some of those features are incorporated into the reactor core itself. For example, all of the fuel in a reactor is sealed in a protective coating made of a zirconium alloy. The protective coating, called a cladding, helps retain heat and radioactivity within the fuel, preventing it from escaping into the plant itself.

Every nuclear plant is also required to have an elaborate safety system to protect against the most serious potential problem of all, loss of coolant. If such an accident were to occur, the reactor core might well melt down, releasing radioactive materials to the rest of the plant and, perhaps, to the outside environment. To prevent such an accident from happening, the pipes carrying the coolant are required to be very thick and strong. In addition, back-up supplies of the coolant must be available to replace losses in case of a leak.

On another level, the whole plant itself is required to be encased within a dome-shaped containment structure. The containment structure is designed to prevent the release of radioactive materials in case of an accident within the reactor core.

Another safety feature is a system of high-efficiency filters through which all air leaving the building must pass. These filters are designed to trap microscopic particles of radioactive materials that might otherwise be vented to the atmosphere. Other specialized devices and systems have also been developed for dealing with other kinds of accidents in various parts of the power plant.

Nuclear power plants differ from each other primarily in the methods they use for transferring heat produced in the reactor to the electricity generating unit. Perhaps the simplest design of all is the boiling water reactor plant (BWR) in which coolant water surrounding the reactor is allowed to boil and form steam. That steam is then piped directly to turbines, whose spinning drives the electrical generator. A very different type of plant is one that was popular in Great Britain for many years, one that used carbon dioxide as a coolant. In this type of plant, carbon dioxide gas passes through the reactor core, absorbs heat produced by fission reactions, and is piped into a secondary system. There the heated carbon dioxide gas gives up its energy to water, which begins to boil and change to steam. That steam is then used to power the turbine and generator.

In spite of all the systems developed by nuclear engineers, the general public has long had serious concerns about the use of such plants as sources of electrical power. Those concerns vary considerably from nation to nation. In France, for example, more than half of all that country's electrical power now comes from nuclear power plants. The initial enthusiasm for nuclear power in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s soon faded, and no nuclear power plants have been constructed in this country in more than a decade.

One concern about nuclear power plants, of course, is an echo of the world's first exposure to nuclear power, the atomic bomb blasts. Many people fear that a nuclear power plant may go out of control and explode like a nuclear weapon. And, in spite of experts' insistence that such an event is impossible, a few major disasters have instigated the fear of nuclear power plants exploding. By far the most serious of those disasters was the explosion that occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant near Kiev in the Ukraine in 1986.

On April 16 of that year, one of the four power-generating units in the Chernobyl complex exploded, blowing the top off the containment building. Hundreds of thousands of nearby residents were exposed to lethal or damaging levels of radiation and were removed from the area. Radioactive clouds released by the explosion were detected as far away as western Europe. More than a decade later, the remains of the Chernobyl reactor remain far too radioactive for anyone to spend more than a few minutes in the area.

Critics also worry about the amount of radioactivity released by nuclear power plants on a day-to-day basis. This concern is probably of less importance than is the possibility of a major disaster. Studies have shown that nuclear power plants are so well shielded that the amount of radiation to which nearby residents are exposed is no more than that of a person living many miles away.

In any case, safety concerns in the United States have been serious enough to essentially bring the construction of new plants to a halt in the last decade. Licensing procedures are now so complex and so expensive that few industries are interested in working their way through the bureaucratic maze to construct new plants.

Perhaps the single most troubling issue for the nuclear power industry is waste management. After a period of time, the fuel rods in a reactor are no longer able to sustain a chain reaction and must be removed. These rods are still highly radioactive, however, and present a serious threat to human life and the environment. Techniques must be developed for the destruction and/or storage of these wastes.

Nuclear wastes can be classified into two general categories, low-level wastes and high-level wastes. The former consist of materials that release a relatively modest level of radiation and/or that will soon decay to a level where they no longer present a threat to humans and the environment. Storing these materials in underground or underwater reservoirs for a few years or in some other system is usually a satisfactory way of handling these materials.

High-level wastes are a different matter. The materials that make up these wastes are intensely radioactive and are likely to remain so for thousands of years. Short-term methods of storage are unsatisfactory because containers leak and break open long before the wastes are safe.

For more than two decades, the United States government has been attempting to develop a plan for the storage of high-level nuclear wastes. At one time, the plan was to bury the wastes in a salt mine near Lyons, Kansas. Objections from residents of the area and other concerned citizens made that plan infeasible. More recently, the government decided to construct a huge crypt in the middle of Yucca Mountain in Nevada for the burial of high-level wastes. Again, complaints by residents of Nevada and other citizens have delayed placing that plan into operation. The government insists, however, that Yucca Mountain will eventually become the long-term storage site for the nation's high-level radioactive wastes. Until that site is actually put into operation, however, those wastes are in "temporary" storage at nuclear power sites throughout the United States.

The first nuclear reactor was built during World War II as part of the Manhattan Project to build an atomic bomb. The reactor was constructed under the direction of Enrico Fermi in a large room beneath the squash courts at the University of Chicago. It was built as the first concrete test of existing theories of nuclear fission.

Until the day on December 2, 1942, when the reactor was first put into operation, scientists had relied entirely on mathematical calculations to determine the effectiveness of nuclear fission as an energy source. It goes without saying that the scientists who constructed the first reactor were taking an extraordinary chance.

That reactor consisted of alternating layers of uranium and uranium oxide with graphite as a moderator.Cadmium control rods were used to control the concentration of neutrons in the reactor. Since the various parts of the reactor were constructed by piling materials on top of each other, the unit was at first known as an atomic "pile." The moment at which Fermi directed the control rods to be withdrawn occurred at 3:45 p.m. on December 2, 1945, and that date can legitimately be regarded as the beginning of the age of controlled nuclear power in human history.

Many scientists believe that the ultimate solution to the world's energy problems may be in the harnessing of nuclear fusion. A fusion reaction is one in which two small nuclei combine with each other to form one larger nucleus. As an example, two hydrogen nuclei may combine with each other to form the nucleus of an atom known as deuterium, or heavy hydrogen.

Many scientists now believe that fusion reactions are responsible for the production of energy in stars. They hypothesize that four hydrogen atoms fuse with each other in a series of reactions to form a single helium atom. An important byproduct of these fusion reactions is the release of an enormous amount of energy. In fact, gram-for-gram, a fusion reaction releases many times more energy than does a fission reaction.

The world was introduced to the concept of fusion reactions in the 1950s when the Soviet Union and the United States exploded the first fusion ("hydrogen") bombs. The energy released in the explosion of each such bomb was more than 1,000 times greater than the energy released in the explosion of a single fission bomb.

As with fission, scientists and non-scientists alike expressed hope that fusion reactions could someday be harnessed as a source of energy for everyday needs. This line of research has been much less successful, however, than research on fission power plants. In essence, the problem has been to find a way of containing the very high temperatures produced (a few million degrees Celsius) when fusion occurs. Optimistic reports of progress on a fusion power plant appear in the press from time to time, but some authorities now doubt that fusion power will ever be an economic reality.

This is the complete article, containing 1,997 words (approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page).

Purchase our Nuclear Power article Nuclear Power article
More Information
  • View Nuclear Power Study Pack
  • 35 Alternative Definitions
  • Search Results for "Nuclear Power"
  • More Products on This Subject
    Abolishing Nuclear Energy in Our Society
    Abolishing Nuclear Energy in Our Society Although nuclear power plants provide us with an abu... more

    Debating Nuclear Power
    With the world¡¦s dependency on fossil fuels becoming an increasingly alarming concern fur... more


    Ask any question on Nuclear power and get it answered FAST!
    Answer questions in BookRags Q&A and earn points toward
    discounted or even FREE Study Guides and other BookRags products!
    Learn more about BookRags Q&A
    Copyrights
    Nuclear Power from World of Physics. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.

    Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags

    Join BookRagslearn moreJoin BookRags