The Daughter of Time

Can anyone help me with the best answer for this question? Thank you.

What rationale do Grant and Carradine develop that casts doubt upon Sir Thomas More’s ability to be considered a reliable “eye-witness” account to Richard III’s life?

Asked by twagone on 10 Feb 03:43

Last updated by Jill W on 04 Aug 12:16

1 Answers

Answered by Jill W on 04 Aug 12:16

Grant discovers that Thomas More could not possibly have been able to document Richard III's life and, reading the preface again, realizes More was only five years old when Richard took the throne. Although he acknowledges More's great mind, he is disgusted that the information is simply hearsay and not true evidence of anything, calling it a swindle.

Source(s)

The Daughter of Time