Question: English & Literature

Edwin Abbott was a theologian. Discuss the possible connection between the story of Flatland and theology. How dies it relate to today?
In English & Literature | Asked by APEng11
Asked from the Edwin Abbott Abbott study pack
Best Answer

In Philomythus ( 1891 ), his belated attack on John Henry Newman 
Essay on, Ecclesiastical Miracles ( 1843 ), Edwin Abbott rejects 
Newman's claim that accounts of miracles do not require legal 
proofs: "here faith has no place," writes Abbott, "and 'legal proof' is 
the best possible proof; and if you cannot get it, you ought to try at 
least to get something as much like it as possible" (90). In place of 
Newman's principle of "antecedent probability" -- that ecclesiastical 
miracles should be presumed true on the basis of their Biblical pre- 
decessors -- Abbott offers a diametrically opposite principle:

[P]eople practically deny, and are quite fight in practically denying, the existence of every- 
thing of which they have no evidence, direct or indirect.
 There may be regions of four, five, 
or fifty dimensions. . . . But we are so constituted as not to act on any "may be" that 
is not at least suggested by some evidence. . . . The right rule is, to regard as 
non-existent all alleged facts for which there is no evidence direct or indirect; and 
to regard as antecedently false, or highly improbable, all statements that contradict our 
knowledge of the fixed and orderly course of things.
 (91-92; original emphasis)

Abbott's reference to "regions of four, five, or fifty dimen- 
sions" is not a casual one. Although best known in his own day as a 
successful headmaster and a theological controversialist, he is best 
known in ours as the author of Flatland ( 1884 ), the charming "Ro- 
mance of Many Dimensions." Indeed, Flatland's story of a two-dimen- 
sional figure struggling to understand and describe three-dimensional 
space has long fascinated mathematicians and physicists similarly strug- 
gling with n-dimensional and non-Euclidean geometries.1 In contrast, 
recent scholarship has begun to situate Flatland in relation to Abbott's 
other writings, particularly his characteristically liberal views on science 
and religion.2 Yet most of this scholarship shares with the work of the 
scientific and mathematical popularizers the assumption that Flatland 
celebrates the powers of the imagination. We want to suggest, however, 
that Flatland is a cautionary tale about the dangers of the imagination



when wrongly employed. More specifically, it can be viewed as part of
Abbott's longstanding effort to expose what he regarded as the falla
cies in Newman's theology, especially his appropriation of the analog
ical and probabilistic reasoning of Bishop Joseph Butler Analogy of
 ( 1736 ). Such a perspective further broadens the intellectual,
social, and religious context in which Flatland and Abbott's Newman
writings are located by demonstrating their role in Victorian debates
over the status of Newman and Butler and in the various constructions
and uses of probability.


Abbott graduated from Cambridge in 1861. Four years later,
at twenty-six, he was appointed headmaster of the City of London
School (CLS), where he remained until 1889. He quickly established
a reputation as a curricular reformer whose school provided a more
relevant and practical education for its urban, middle-class clientele.3
During the 1870s, he launched his prolific career as a writer, publishing
studies of theology, Shakespeare, and Bacon; textbooks on grammar
and composition; and even a Christian historical romance. Flatland
appeared, anonymously, in 1884. Five years later, Abbott retired from
the CLS to devote the remainder of his life to the exposition of his
theological system.

bhuvaneswari | 2395 days ago
No answers yet
Do you know the answer to this question? Help out APEng11 by answering it!