Though there are one or two other members like Baines and Sedley, most of them are men who have refused professional openings rather than actual money.  There are, for instance, half a dozen journalists and authors.  Now a journalist, before he can be elected, must have a black-list of papers for which he will refuse to write.  A concocted wireless message in the Daily Blank, which subsequent events proved to have been invented deliberately for the purpose of raking in ha’pennies, so infuriated Henderson (to take a case) that he has pledged himself never to write a line for any paper owned by the same proprietors.  Curiously enough he was asked a day or two later to contribute a series to a most respectable magazine published by this firm.  He refused in a letter which breathed hatred and utter contempt in every word.  It was Henderson, too, who resigned his position as dramatic critic because the proprietor of his paper did rather a shady thing in private life.  “I know the paper isn’t mixed up in it at all,” he said, “but he’s my employer and he pays me.  Well, I like to be loyal to my employers, and if I’m loyal to this man I can’t go about telling everybody that he’s a dirty cad.  As I particularly want to.”

Then there is the case of Bolus the author.  He is only an honorary member, for he has not as yet had the opportunity of refusing money or work.  But he has refused to be photographed and interviewed, and he has refused to contribute to symposia in the monthly magazines.  He has declined with thanks, moreover, invitations to half a dozen houses sent to him by hostesses who only knew him by reputation.  Myself, I think it is time that he was elected a full member; indirectly he must have been a financial loser by his action, and even if he is not actually assisting to topple over the Money God, he is at least striking a blow for the cause of independence.  However, there he is, and with him goes a certain M.P. who contributed œ20,000 to the party chest, and refused scornfully the peerage which was offered to him.

The Bar is represented by P. J. Brewster, who was elected for refusing to defend a suspected murderer until he had absolutely convinced himself of the man’s innocence.  It was suggested to him by his legal brothers that counsel did not pledge themselves to the innocence of their clients, but merely put the case for one side in a perfectly detached way, according to the best traditions of the Bar.  Brewster replied that he was also quite capable of putting the case for Tariff Reform in a perfectly detached way according to the best traditions of The Morning Post, but as he was a Free Trader he thought he would refuse any such offer if it were made to him.  He added, however, that he was not in the present case worrying about moral points of view; he was simply expressing his opinion that the luxury of not having little notes passed to him in court by a probable murderer, of not sharing a page in an illustrated paper with him, and of not having to shake hands with him if he were acquitted, was worth paying for.  Later on, when as K.C., M.P., he refused the position of standing counsel to a paper which he was always attacking in the House, he became a life member of the club.