“colour yellowish.” [Footnote:  Hakluyt, III. 248.] Captain John Smith, speaking of those of the Chesapeake, remarks, that they “are of a color brown when they are of age, but they are born white.” [Footnote:  Smith, Map of Virginia, 1612, p. 19.] On the other hand the natives of Massachusetts and Rhode Island in latitude 4l Degrees 40’ are described by the first explorers of that region in substantially the same terms.  Brereton, who accompanied Gosnold in his first voyage to the Elisabeth islands and the main land opposite, in 1602, mentions the natives there, as being of a complexion or color “much like a dark olive.” [Footnote:  Purchas, iv. 1652.] Martin Fringe who visited Martha’s Vineyard the next year and constructed there a barricade where the “people of the country came sometimes, ten, twentie, fortie or three score, and at one time one hundred and twentie at once,” says, “these people are inclined to a swart, tawnie or chesnut colour, not by nature but accidentally.” [Footnote:  Ibid, iv, 1655.] And Roger Williams, partaking of the same idea as Pringe, that the swarthy color was accidental, testifies, almost in the same language as Captain Smith, that the Narragansets and others within a region of two hundred miles of them, were “tawnie by the sunne and their annoyntings, yet they were born white.” [Footnote:  Roger Williams’s Key, 52.] Thus the authorities flatly contradict the statement of black Indians existing in North Carolina, and a difference of color between the people of the two sections claimed to have been visited in this voyage.

Of an equally absurd and preposterous character is the statement made in reference to the condition in which the plants and vegetation were found.  The grape particularly is mentioned in a manner which proves, beyond question, that the writer could not have been in the country.  The dates which are given for the exploration are positive; and are conclusive in this respect.  The Dauphiny is represented as having left Madeira on the 17th of January, and arrived on the coast on the 7th of March, that is, the 17th of that month, new style. [Footnote:  See ante, page 4, note.] They left the harbor of the great bay, where they had remained for fifteen days on the 6th of May, which makes their arrival there to have been on the 21st of April, or first of May, N. S. They were thus during the months of March and April, engaged in coasting from the landfall to the great bay in latitude 41 Degrees 40’, during which period the observations relating to the intermediate country, consequently, must have been made.  They left the coast, finally, in latitude 50 Degrees N., for the purpose of returning to France, in time to reach there and have the letter written announcing their arrival at Dieppe on the 8th of July, and therefore it must have been some time in June, at the latest; so that very little if any portion of the summer season was passed upon the coast of America.