He induced me to come to a meeting of this union of
the orchestral company, in order that I might form
an opinion about it, and encourage and support so
praiseworthy a movement. On this occasion I communicated
to its members the contents of my memorandum to the
director, which had been rejected a year before, and
in which I had made suggestions for reforms in the
band, and I also explained further intentions and plans
arising therefrom. At the same time I was obliged
to confess that I had lost all hope of carrying out
any projects of the kind through the general management,
and must therefore recommend them to take the initiative
vigorously into their own hands. They acclaimed
the idea with enthusiastic approval. Although,
as I have said before, Luettichau left these musicians
unmolested in their more or less democratic union,
yet he took care to be informed through spies of what
took place at their highly treasonable gatherings.
His chief instrument was a bugler named Lewy, who,
much to the disgust of all his comrades in the orchestra,
was in particularly high favour with the director.
He consequently received precise, or rather exaggerated,
accounts of my appearance there, and thought it was
now high time to let me once more feel the weight
of his authority. I was officially summoned to
his presence, and had to listen to a long and wrathful
tirade which he had been bottling up for some time
about several matters. I also learned that he
knew all about the plan of theatre reform which I had
laid before the ministry. This knowledge he betrayed
in a popular Dresden phrase, which until then I had
never heard; he knew very well, he said, that in a
memorandum respecting the theatre I had ‘made
him look ridiculous’ (ihm an den Laden gelegt).
In answer to this I did not refrain from telling him
how I intended to act in retaliation, and when he
threatened to report me to the King and demand my
dismissal, I calmly replied that he might do as he
pleased, as I was well assured that I could rely on
his Majesty’s justice to hear, not only his
charges, but also my defence. Moreover, I added,
this was the only befitting manner for me to discuss
with the King the many points on which I had to complain,
not only in my own interests, but also in those of
the theatre and of art. This was not pleasant
hearing for Luttichau, and he asked how it was possible
for him to try and co-operate with me, when I for
my part had openly declared (to use his own expression)
that all labour was wasted upon him (Hopfen und Malz
verloren seien). We had at last to part with mutual
shruggings of the shoulder. My conduct seemed
to trouble my former patron, and he therefore enlisted
the tact and moderation of Eduard Devrient in his
service, and asked him to use his influence with me
to facilitate some further arrangement between us.
But, in spite of all his zeal, Devrient had to admit
with a smile, after we had discussed his message,
that nothing much could be done; and as I persisted
in my refusal to meet the director again in consultation
respecting the service of the theatre, he had at last
to recognise that his own wisdom would have to help
him out of the difficulty.


