royal palace, and had been rewarded by his friends
with a banquet, appeared to me to have the right to
be honoured as a great master. I was very much
astonished, therefore, when Franck calmly pitied the
King of Saxony for having had his room ‘bedaubed’
by Bendemann! Nevertheless, there was no denying
that these people were ’good-natured.’
My intercourse with them became more frequent, and
at all events offered me opportunities of mixing with
the more cultured artistic society, in distinction
to the theatrical circles with which I had usually
associated; yet I never derived from it the least
enthusiasm or inspiration. The latter, however,
appears to have been Hiller’s main object, and
that winter he organised a sort of social circle which
held weekly meetings at the home of one or the other
of its members in turn. Reinecke, who was both
painter and poet, joined this society, together with
Hubner and Bendemann, and had the bad fortune to write
the new text for an opera for Hiller, the fate of
which I will describe later on. Robert Schumann,
the musician, who was also in Dresden at this time,
and was busy working out on opera, which eventually
developed into Genovefa, made advances to Hiller and
myself. I had already known Schumann in Leipzig,
and we had both entered upon our musical careers at
about the same time. I had also occasionally
sent small contributions to the Neue Zeitschrift fur
Musik, of which he had formerly been editor, and more
recently a longer one from Paris on Rossini’s
Stabat Mater. He had been asked to conduct his
Paradies und Peri at a concert to be given at the
theatre; but his peculiar awkwardness in conducting
on that occasion aroused my sympathy for the conscientious
and energetic musician whose work made so strong an
appeal to me, and a kindly and friendly confidence
soon grew up between us. After a performance
of Tannhauser, at which he was present, he called on
me one morning and declared himself fully and decidedly
in favour of my work. The only objection he had
to make was that the stretta of the second finale
was too abrupt, a criticism which proved his keenness
of perception; and I was able to show him, by the
score, how I had been compelled, much against my inclination,
to curtail the opera, and thereby create the position
to which he had taken exception. We often met
when out walking and, as far as it was possible with
a person so sparing of words, we exchanged views on
matters of musical interest. He was looking forward
to the production, under my baton, of Beethoven’s
Ninth Symphony, as he had attended the performances
at Leipzig, and had been very much disappointed by
Mendelssohn’s conducting, which had quite misunderstood
the time of the first movement. Otherwise his
society did not inspire me particularly, and the fact
that he was too conservative to benefit by my views
was soon shown, more especially in his conception
of the poem of Genovefa. It was clear that my
example had only made a very transient impression


