“The ‘friend’ can confer with you,” said Richardot to Champagny; “but his Highness is not to appear to know anything at all about it.  The Queen must signify her intentions.”

“You answered Champagny correctly,” said Burghley to De Loo, “as to what I said last winter concerning her Majesty’s wishes in regard to a pacification.  The Netherlands must be compelled to return to obedience to the King; but their ancient privileges are to be maintained.  You omitted, however, to say a word about toleration, in the Provinces, of the reformed religion.  But I said then, as I say now, that this is a condition indispensable to peace.”

This was a somewhat important omission on the part of De Loo, and gives the measure of his conscientiousness or his capacity as a negotiator.  Certainly for the Lord-Treasurer of England to offer, on the part of her Majesty, to bring about the reduction of her allies under the yoke which they had thrown off without her assistance, and this without leave asked of them, and with no provision for the great principle of religious liberty, which was the cause of the revolt, was a most flagitious trifling with the honour of Elizabeth and of England.  Certainly the more this mysterious correspondence is examined, the more conclusive is the justification of the vague and instinctive jealousy felt by Leicester and the States-General as to English diplomacy during the winter and spring of 1586.

Burghley summoned De Loo, accordingly, to recall to his memory all that had been privately said to him on the necessity of protecting the reformed religion in the Provinces.  If a peace were to be perpetual, toleration was indispensable, he observed, and her Majesty was said to desire this condition most earnestly.

The Lord-Treasurer also made the not unreasonable suggestion, that, in case of a pacification, it would be necessary to provide that English subjects—­peaceful traders, mariners, and the like—­should no longer be shut up in the Inquisition prisons of Spain and Portugal, and there starved to death, as, with great multitudes, had already been the case.

Meantime Alexander, while encouraging and directing all these underhand measures, was carefully impressing upon his master that he was not, in the least degree; bound by any such negotiations.  “Queen Elizabeth,” he correctly observed to Philip, “is a woman:  she is also by no means fond of expense.  The kingdom, accustomed to repose, is already weary of war therefore, they are all pacifically inclined.”  “It has been intimated to me,” he said, “that if I would send a properly qualified person, who should declare that your Majesty had not absolutely forbidden the coming of Lord Leicester, such an agent would be well received, and perhaps the Earl would be recalled.”  Alexander then proceeded, with the coolness befitting a trusted governor of Philip II., to comment upon the course which he was pursuing.  He could at any time denounce the negotiations which he was secretly prompting.  Meantime immense advantages could be obtained by the deception practised upon an enemy whose own object was to deceive.