Count Aremberg, and Baron Berlaymont.  The Duke and Count had refused to join the league; violent scenes having occurred upon the subject between them and the leaders of the opposition party.  Egmont, being with a large shooting party at Aerschot’s country place, Beaumont, had taken occasion to urge the Duke to join in the general demonstration against the Cardinal, arguing the matter in the rough, off-hand, reckless manner which was habitual with him.  His arguments offended the nobleman thus addressed, who was vain and irascible.  He replied by affirming that he was a friend to Egmont, but would not have him for his master.  He would have nothing to do, he said, with their league against the Cardinal, who had never given him cause of enmity.  He had no disposition to dictate to the King as to his choice of ministers, and his Majesty was quite right to select his servants at his own pleasure.  The Duke added that if the seigniors did not wish him for a friend, it was a matter of indifference to him.  Not one of them was his superior; he had as large a band of noble followers and friends as the best of them, and he had no disposition to accept the supremacy of any nobleman in the land.  The conversation carried on in this key soon became a quarrel, and from words the two gentlemen would soon have come to blows, but for the interposition of Aremberg and Robles, who were present at the scene.  The Duchess of Parma, narrating the occurrence to the King, added that a duel had been the expected result of the affair, but that the two nobles had eventually been reconciled.  It was characteristic of Aerschot that he continued afterward to associate with the nobles upon friendly terms, while maintaining an increased intimacy with the Cardinal.

The gentlemen who sent the letter were annoyed at the premature publicity which it seemed to have attained.  Orange had in vain solicited Count Aremberg to join the league, and had quarrelled with him in consequence.  Egmont, in the presence of Madame de Parma, openly charged Aremberg with having divulged the secret which had been confided to him.  The Count fiercely denied that he had uttered a syllable on the subject to a human being; but added that any communication on his part would have been quite superfluous, while Egmont and his friends were daily boasting of what they were to accomplish.  Egmont reiterated the charge of a breach of faith by Aremberg.  That nobleman replied by laying his hand upon his sword, denouncing as liars all persons who should dare to charge him again with such an offence, and offering to fight out the quarrel upon the instant.  Here, again, personal combat was, with much difficulty, averted.