the consequences he would practice deception, and utter direct falsehood without compunction or hesitation.  At last, after a struggle of two years, even the father became wearied and discouraged at the perseverance of his child; and there came a suggestion to his mind, that probably, to continue as he had been going on for so long a time, would do more harm than good.  It requires no little self-denial for a man like Andrew Howland to yield in such a contention, and let the will of his child remain unbroken.  But, after a long debate with himself, his better conviction triumphed over prejudice and the tenacity of a mind fixed in its own opinions.  He ceased to command obedience in the case of Emily Winters, and therefore ceased to punish Andrew on her account.  Nevertheless, he rarely saw him in her company that the displeasure he felt was not manifested by a frown, or some word that smote painfully upon the ear of his child.

Possessing an active, independent mind, Andrew failed not to excite the displeasure of his father in many ways.  In fact he was always in disgrace from some cause or other and the subject of angry reproof, harsh judgment, or direct punishment.  Often his conduct needed reproof and even punishment; but he was the victim of such frequent wrong judgment and unjust reproof and punishment, that by the time he was eleven years of age, he looked upon his father more as a persecuting tyrant than a kind parent, who sincerely desired his good.  An instance of wrong judgment and unjust punishment we will here give.

As Andrew grew older and formed school boy associations, his impulsive and rather reckless character brought him frequently into collision with his companions, and he gained a reputation which was by no means good.  Every now and then some one would complain to Mr. Howland of his bad conduct, when he, taking all for granted, would, without investigation, visit the offence with severe punishment.

One day, when in his twelfth year, as Andrew was at play during a recess in the school hour, a boy larger than himself made an angry attack upon a lad much below him in size, and was abusing him severely, when Andrew, acting from a brave and generous impulse, ran to the rescue of the smaller boy, and, in a sudden onset, freed him from the hands of his assailant.  Maddened at this interference. the larger boy turned fiercely upon him.  But Andrew was active, and kept out of his way.  Still the larger boy pursued him, using all the while the most violent threats.  At length finding that he was likely to be caught and get roughly handled, Andrew took up a stone, and drawing back his hand, warned the boy not to approach.  He continued to approach, however, vowing, as he did so, that he would beat the life half out of him.  True to his word, and in self-defence, Andrew threw the stone, which struck the boy full on the forehead and knocked him down.  For some minutes he lay stunned and half-insensible.  Frightened at the consequences of his act, Andrew sprung to the side of the fallen lad and tried to raise him up.  Failing in this he ran for the teacher, who was in the school-room.  A little cold water thrown into the boy’s face revived him, when he went home to his parents.  The teacher made careful inquiries into the matter, which satisfied him that Andrew was not very greatly to blame.