joys they anticipate, what fears they sustain, how
they regard the end and cessation of life and perception,
which waits for us all. The worst of it is that
people are often so modest; they think that their
own experience is so dull, so unromantic, so uninteresting.
It is an entire mistake. If the dullest person
in the world would only put down sincerely what he
or she thought about his or her life, about work and
love, religion and emotion, it would be a fascinating
document. My only sorrow is that the amateurs
of whom I have spoken above will not do this; they
rather turn to external and impersonal impressions,
relate definite things, what they see on their travels,
for instance, describing just the things which any
one can see. They tend to indulge in the melancholy
labour of translation, or employ customary, familiar
forms, such as the novel or the play. If only
they would write diaries and publish them; compose
imaginary letters; let one inside the house of self
instead of keeping one wandering in the park!
The real interest of literature is the apprehending
of other points of view; one spends an immense time
in what is called society, in the pursuit of other
people’s views; but what a very little grain
results from an intolerable deal of chaff! And
all because people are conventional and not simple-minded;
because they will not say what they think; indeed they
will not as a rule try to find out what they do think,
but prefer to traffic with the conventional counters.
Yet what a refreshment it is to meet with a perfectly
sincere person, who makes you feel that you are in
real contact with a human being! This is what
we ought to aim at in writing: at a perfectly
sincere presentment of our thoughts. We cannot,
of course, all of us hope to have views upon art,
upon theology, upon politics, upon education, because
we may not have any experience in these subjects;
but we have all of us experience in life, in nature,
in emotion, in religion; and to express what we feel,
as sincerely as we can, is certainly useful to ourselves,
because it clears our view, leads us not to confuse
hopes with certainties, enables us to disentangle what
we really believe from what we conventionally adopt.
Of course this cannot be done all at once; when we
first begin to write, we find how difficult it is
to keep the thread of our thoughts; we keep turning
out of the main road to explore attractive by-paths;
we cannot arrange our ideas. All writers who
produce original work pass through a stage in which
they are conscious of a throng of kindred notions,
all more or less bearing on the central thought, but
the movements of which they cannot wholly control.
Their thoughts are like a turbulent crowd, and one’s
business is to drill them into an ordered regiment.
A writer has to pass through a certain apprenticeship;
and the cure for this natural vagueness is to choose
small precise subjects, to say all that we have in
our minds about them, and to stop when we have finished;
not to aim at fine writing, but at definiteness and
clearness.