an extremely remote epoch, when they confounded themselves with witchcraft, also became a power in the hands of the individual which could be used against the tribe.  They were carefully kept in secrecy, and transmitted to the initiated only, in the secret societies of witches, shamans, and priests, which we find among all savages.  By the same time, wars and invasions created military authority, as also castes of warriors, whose associations or clubs acquired great powers.  However, at no period of man’s life were wars the normal state of existence.  While warriors exterminated each other, and the priests celebrated their massacres, the masses continued to live their daily life, they prosecuted their daily toil.  And it is one of the most interesting studies to follow that life of the masses; to study the means by which they maintained their own social organization, which was based upon their own conceptions of equity, mutual aid, and mutual support—­of common law, in a word, even when they were submitted to the most ferocious theocracy or autocracy in the State.

Notes: 

1.  Nineteenth Century, February 1888, p. 165.

2.  The Descent of Man, end of ch. ii. pp. 63 and 64 of the 2nd edition.

3.  Anthropologists who fully endorse the above views as regards man nevertheless intimate, sometimes, that the apes live in polygamous families, under the leadership of “a strong and jealous male.”  I do not know how far that assertion is based upon conclusive observation.  But the passage from Brehm’s Life of Animals, which is sometimes referred to, can hardly be taken as very conclusive.  It occurs in his general description of monkeys; but his more detailed descriptions of separate species either contradict it or do not confirm it.  Even as regards the cercopitheques, Brehm is affirmative in saying that they “nearly always live in bands, and very seldom in families” (French edition, p. 59).  As to other species, the very numbers of their bands, always containing many males, render the “polygamous family” more than doubtful further observation is evidently wanted.

4.  Lubbock, Prehistoric Times, fifth edition, 1890.

5.  That extension of the ice-cap is admitted by most of the geologists who have specially studied the glacial age.  The Russian Geological Survey already has taken this view as regards Russia, and most German specialists maintain it as regards Germany.  The glaciation of most of the central plateau of France will not fail to be recognized by the French geologists, when they pay more attention to the glacial deposits altogether.

6.  Prehistoric Times, pp. 232 and 242.