Mutual Aid; a factor of evolution eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 335 pages of information about Mutual Aid; a factor of evolution.

Mutual Aid; a factor of evolution eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 335 pages of information about Mutual Aid; a factor of evolution.

In Germany, in Austria, in Belgium the village community was also destroyed by the State.  Instances of commoners themselves dividing their lands were rare,(13) while everywhere the States coerced them to enforce the division, or simply favoured the private appropriation of their lands.  The last blow to communal ownership in Middle Europe also dates from the middle of the eighteenth century.  In Austria sheer force was used by the Government, in 1768, to compel the communes to divide their lands—­ a special commission being nominated two years later for that purpose.  In Prussia Frederick the Second, in several of his ordinances (in 1752, 1763, 1765, and 1769), recommended to the Justizcollegien to enforce the division.  In Silesia a special resolution was issued to serve that aim in 1771.  The same took place in Belgium, and, as the communes did not obey, a law was issued in 1847 empowering the Government to buy communal meadows in order to sell them in retail, and to make a forced sale of the communal land when there was a would-be buyer for it.(14)

In short, to speak of the natural death of the village communities in virtue of economical laws is as grim a joke as to speak of the natural death of soldiers slaughtered on a battlefield.  The fact was simply this:  The village communities had lived for over a thousand years; and where and when the peasants were not ruined by wars and exactions they steadily improved their methods of culture.  But as the value of land was increasing, in consequence of the growth of industries, and the nobility had acquired, under the State organization, a power which it never had had under the feudal system, it took possession of the best parts of the communal lands, and did its best to destroy the communal institutions.

However, the village-community institutions so well respond to the needs and conceptions of the tillers of the soil that, in spite of all, Europe is up to this date covered with living survivals of the village communities, and European country life is permeated with customs and habits dating from the community period.  Even in England, notwithstanding all the drastic measures taken against the old order of things, it prevailed as late as the beginning of the nineteenth century.  Mr. Gomme—­one of the very few English scholars who have paid attention to the subject—­ shows in his work that many traces of the communal possession of the soil are found in Scotland, “runrig” tenancy having been maintained in Forfarshire up to 1813, while in certain villages of Inverness the custom was, up to 1801, to plough the land for the whole community, without leaving any boundaries, and to allot it after the ploughing was done.  In Kilmorie the allotment and re-allotment of the fields was in full vigour “till the last twenty-five years,” and the Crofters’ Commission found it still in vigour in certain islands.(15) In Ireland the system prevailed up to the great famine; and as to England, Marshall’s

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Mutual Aid; a factor of evolution from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.