3.  Some discussion has lately taken place upon the Weichbild and the Weichbild-law, which still remain obscure (see Zopfl, Alterthumer des deutschen Reichs und Rechts, iii. 29; Kallsen, i. 316).  The above explanation seems to be the more probable, but, of course, it must be tested by further research.  It is also evident that, to use a Scotch expression, the “mercet cross” could be considered as an emblem of Church jurisdiction, but we find it both in bishop cities and in those in which the folkmote was sovereign.

4.  For all concerning the merchant guild see Mr. Gross’s exhaustive work, The Guild Merchant (Oxford, 1890, 2 vols.); also Mrs. Green’s remarks in Town Life in the Fifteenth Century, vol. ii. chaps. v. viii. x; and A. Doren’s review of the subject in Schmoller’s Forschungen, vol. xii.  If the considerations indicated in the previous chapter (according to which trade was communal at its beginnings) prove to be correct, it will be permissible to suggest as a probable hypothesis that the guild merchant was a body entrusted with commerce in the interest of the whole city, and only gradually became a guild of merchants trading for themselves; while the merchant adventurers of this country, the Novgorod povolniki (free colonizers and merchants) and the mercati personati, would be those to whom it was left to open new markets and new branches of commerce for themselves.  Altogether, it must be remarked that the origin of the mediaeval city can be ascribed to no separate agency.  It was a result of many agencies in different degrees.

5.  Janssen’s Geschichte des deutschen Volkes, i. 315; Gramich’s Wurzburg; and, in fact, any collection of ordinances.

6.  Falke, Geschichtliche Statistik, i. 373-393, and ii. 66; quoted in Janssen’s Geschichte, i. 339; J.D.  Blavignac, in Comptes et depenses de la construction du clocher de Saint-Nicolas a Fribourg en Suisse, comes to a similar conclusion.  For Amiens, De Calonne’s Vie Municipale, p. 99 and Appendix.  For a thorough appreciation and graphical representation of the medieval wages in England and their value in bread and meat, see G. Steffen’s excellent article and curves in The Nineteenth Century for 1891, and Studier ofver lonsystemets historia i England, Stockholm, 1895.

7.  To quote but one example out of many which may be found in Schonberg’s and Falke’s works, the sixteen shoemaker workers (Schusterknechte) of the town Xanten, on the Rhine, gave, for erecting a screen and an altar in the church, 75 guldens of subscriptions, and 12 guldens out of their box, which money was worth, according to the best valuations, ten times its present value.

8.  Quoted by Janssen, l.c. i. 343.

9.  The Economical Interpretation of History, London, 1891, p. 303.