In reference to the Hartel affair I enclose his two letters of March 4th and 5th.  At the end of February I had a long conversation about the matter at Leipzig with Dr. Hartel, and tried to persuade him to renew his first proposal to you, because that seemed to me the most advantageous thing for you.  After a few days’ consideration he sent me the letter, dated March 4th, and I replied in the sense of my conversation with him.  I tried to show him as clearly as possible that this matter ought to be looked upon as a grand enterprise rather than as a common commercial speculation, and that the firm of Breitkopf and Hartel, which already possessed lohengrin and the three operatic poems, would, in my opinion, be the most eligible for that purpose.  I have not kept a copy of my letter, but can assure you that you need not disavow a single word of it.  Hartal’s letter of March 16th is identical with that addressed to you.  As matters stand, I am very doubtful whether the Hartels will make you a new offer of honorarium unless, of course, the immediate impression of your rendering of the work on them should be so powerful as to overcome their commercial timidity.  On your part I should not think it advisable to make them a new offer, and you have, no doubt, hit upon the best idea in inviting them to Zurich, so that you may be able to give them at least some previous idea of your work.  This, I think, will be your most favourable chance in the circumstances.  The intention of the Hartels for the present is, of course, to offer you nothing but an eventual honorarium after the publication of the work, and after the expenses of that publication have been covered.  You seem to think that I have not had sufficient time and opportunity for determining the Hartels to a different and better proposal, but there you are very much mistaken; and you may be quite certain that I should willingly have remained at Leipzig for a month or longer, and should have played and sung the Rhinegold to the Hartels several times if I had had the slightest hope that our purpose would in that manner be advanced by a hair’s breadth.  What I laid particular stress on with Hartel, apart from the intrinsic importance of the whole quality and essence of your work, was the possibility and the all but absolute certainty of its performance, which of course is denied on all sides.

At last I told him:  “This I will guarantee, by word and deed, that between the completion of the “Nibelungen”, which may be expected by the end of the next year, and its performance, scarcely a year will elapse, and that the friends of Wagner, and I foremost amongst them, will do all that is possible to bring that performance about.  In this firm conviction I think it desirable that the work should appear in print, so that the necessary standpoint for its judgment may be supplied,” etc., etc., etc.