Second note from the same.  “Do you know that your letter frightens me?  What does it mean?  I have read it twenty times.  In truth I do not understand what it means.  All I can perceive is, that you are uneasy and tormented, and that you wait until you are no longer so before you speak to me upon the subject.  Is this, my dear friend, what we agreed upon?  What then is become of that friendship and confidence, and by what means have I lost them?  Is it with me or for me that you are angry?  However this may be, come to me this evening I conjure you; remember you promised me no longer than a week ago to let nothing remain upon your mind, but immediately to communicate to me whatever might make it uneasy.  My dear friend, I live in that confidence—­There—­I have just read your letter again; I do not understand the contents better, but they make me tremble.  You seem to be cruelly agitated.  I could wish to calm your mind, but as I am ignorant of the cause whence your uneasiness arises, I know not what to say, except that I am as wretched as yourself, and shall remain so until we meet.  If you are not here this evening at six o’clock, I set off to morrow for the Hermitage, let the weather be how it will, and in whatever state of health I may be; for I can no longer support the inquietude I now feel.  Good day, my dear friend, at all risks I take the liberty to tell you, without knowing whether or not you are in need of such advice, to endeavor to stop the progress uneasiness makes in solitude.  A fly be comes a monster.  I have frequently experienced it.”

Answer.  “I can neither come to see you nor receive your visit so long as my present inquietude continues.  The confidence of which you speak no longer exists, and it will be easy for you to recover it.  I see nothing more in your present anxiety than the desire of drawing from the confessions of others some advantage agreeable to your views; and my heart, so ready to pour its overflowings into another which opens itself to receive them, is shut against trick and cunning.  I distinguish your ordinary address in the difficulty you find in understanding my note.  Do you think me dupe enough to believe you have not comprehended what it meant?  No:  but I shall know how to overcome your subtleties by my frankness.  I will explain myself more clearly, that you may understand me still less.

“Two lovers closely united and worthy of each other’s love are dear to me; I expect you will not know who I mean unless I name them.  I presume attempts have been made to disunite them, and that I have been made use of to inspire one of the two with jealousy.  The choice was not judicious, but it appeared convenient to the purposes of malice, and of this malice it is you whom I suspect to be guilty.  I hope this becomes more clear.