her dogged, knew whither she had gone.  The next day he appointed her to visit him; she went directly to the bedroom, believing that his suspicions were entirely lulled.  The Duke then opened the door wide, so that she might be seen from the cabinet, which was full of men; and calling the Chevalier of Bavaria, he said to him:  “Here, Sir Chevalier, come and see your mistress, who will now have no occasion to go so far to find you.”

Although the Duke and the Prince de Conti are brothers-in-law in two ways, they cannot bear each other.

The Duke is at this moment (1718) very strongly attached to Madame de Prie.  She has already received a good beating on his account from her husband, but this does not deter her.  She is said to have a good deal of sense; she entirely governs the Duke, who is solely occupied with making her unfaithful to M. de Prie.  She has consoled the Duke for his dismissal from Madame de Nesle; but it is said that she is unfaithful to him, and that she has two other lovers.  One is the Prince of Carignan, and the other Lior, the King’s first maitre d’hotel, which latter is the handsomest of the three.

It is impossible that the Duke can now inspire any woman with affection for him.  He is tall, thin as a lath; his legs are like those of a crane; his body is bent and short, and he has no calves to his legs; his eyes are so red that it is impossible to distinguish the bad eye from the good one; his cheeks are hollow; his chin so long that one would not suppose it belonged to the face; his lips uncommonly large:  in short, I hardly ever saw a man before so ugly.  It is said that the inconstancy of his mistress, Madame de Prie, afflicts him profoundly.

The Marchioness was extremely beautiful, and her whole person was very captivating.  Possessing as many mental as personal charms, she concealed beneath an apparent simplicity the most dangerous treachery.  Without the least conception of virtue, which, according to her ideas, was a word void of sense, she affected innocence in vice, was violent under an appearance of meekness, and libertine by constitution.  She deceived her lover with perfect impunity, who would believe what she said even against the evidence of his own eyes.  I could mention several instances of this, if they were not too indecent.  It is, however, sufficient to say that she had one day to persuade him that he was the cause of a libertinism of which he was really the victim.—­Memoires de Duclos, tome ii.  It is well known that, after the Duke assumed the Regency, upon the death of the Regent, the Marchioness du Prie governed in his name; and that she was exiled, and died two years afterwards of ennui and vexation.

The Princess of Modena takes nothing by the death of the Duchess; the Duke has said that he never would have married that Princess, and that now he will not marry at all.