On the 18th of January, 1649, I was admitted to a
seat and vote in
Parliament, and signed an alliance with the chief
leaders of the party:
Mm. de Beaufort, de Bouillon, de La Mothe, de
Noirmoutier, de Vitri, de
Brissac, de Maure, de Matha, de Cugnac, de Barnire,
de Sillery, de La
Rochefoucault, de Laigues, de Sevigny, de Bethune,
de Luynes, de
Chaumont, de Saint-Germain, d’Action, and de
Fiesque.
On the 9th of February the Prince de Conde attacked and took Charenton. All this time the country people were flocking to Paris with provisions, not only because there was plenty of money, but to enable the citizens to hold out against the siege, which was begun on the 9th of January.
On the 12th of February a herald came with two trumpeters from the Court to one of the city gates, bringing three packets of letters, one for the Parliament, one for the Prince de Conti, and the third for the Hotel de Ville. It was but the night before that a person was caught in the halls dropping libels against the Parliament and me; upon which the Parliament, Princes, and city supposed that this State visit was nothing but an amusement of Cardinal Mazarin to cover a worse design, and therefore resolved not to receive the message nor give the herald audience, but to send the King’s Council to the Queen to represent to her that their refusal was out of pure obedience and respect, because heralds are never sent but to sovereign Princes or public enemies, and that the Parliament, the Prince de Conti, and the city were neither the one nor the other. At the same time the Chevalier de Lavalette, who distributed the libels, had formed a design to kill me and M. de Beaufort upon the Parliament stairs in the great crowd which they expected would attend the appearance of the herald. The Court, indeed, always denied his having any other commission than to drop the libels, but I am certain that the Bishop of Dole told the Bishop of Aire, but a night or two before, that Beaufort and I should not be among the living three days hence.
The King’s councillors returned with a report how kindly they had been received at Saint Germain. They said the Queen highly approved of the reasons offered by the Parliament for refusing entrance to the herald, and that she had assured them that, though she could not side with the Parliament in the present state of affairs, yet she received with joy the assurances they had given her of their respect and submission, and that she would distinguish them in general and in particular by special marks of her good-will. Talon, Attorney-General, who always spoke with dignity and force, embellished this answer of the Queen with all the ornaments he could give it, assuring the Parliament in very pathetic terms that, if they should be pleased to send a deputation to Saint Germain, it would be very kindly received, and might, perhaps, be a great step towards a peace.

![View The Memoirs of Cardinal de Retz — Volume 2 [Historic court memoirs] Page 55](https://d22o6al7s0pvzr.cloudfront.net/images/bookrags/aero300/content/btn_prev.png?1769134951)
![View The Memoirs of Cardinal de Retz — Volume 2 [Historic court memoirs] Page 57](https://d22o6al7s0pvzr.cloudfront.net/images/bookrags/aero300/content/btn_next.png?1769134951)