Literary Blunders eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 144 pages of information about Literary Blunders.

Literary Blunders eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 144 pages of information about Literary Blunders.

The author of A New Booke of Mistakes, 1637, which treats of ``Quips, Taunts, Retorts, Flowts, Frumps, Mockes, Gibes, Jestes, etc.,’’ says in his address to the Reader, ``There are moreover other simple mistakes in speech which pass p 25under the name of Bulls, but if any man shall demand of mee why they be so called, I must put them off with this woman’s reason, they are so because they bee so.’’ All the author can affirm is that they have no connection with the inns and playhouses of his time styled the Black Bulls and the Red Bulls.  Coleridge’s definition is the best:  ``A bull consists in a mental juxtaposition of incongruous ideas with the sensation but without the sense of connection.’’[3]

     [3] Southey’s Omniana, vol. i., p. 220.

Bulls are usually associated with the Irish, but most other nations are quite capable of making them, and Swift is said to have intended to write an essay on English bulls and blunders.  Sir Thomas Trevor, a Baron of the Exchequer 1625-49, when presiding at the Bury Assizes, had a cause about wintering of cattle before him.  He thought the charge immoderate, and said, ``Why, friend, this is most unreasonable; I wonder thou art not ashamed, for I myself have known a beast wintered one whole summer for a noble.’’ The man at p 26once, with ready wit, cried, ``That was a bull, my lord.’’ Whereat the company was highly amused.[4]

[4] Thoms, Anecdotes and Traditions, 1839, p 79

One of the best-known bulls is that inscribed on the obelisk near Fort William in the Highlands of Scotland.  In this inscription a very clumsy attempt is made to distinguish between natural tracks and made roads:—­

     ``Had you seen these roads before they were made,
       You would lift up your hands and bless General Wade.’’

The bulletins of Pope Clement XIV.’s last illness, which were announced at the Vatican, culminated in a very fair bull.  The notices commenced with ``His Holiness is very ill,’’ and ended with ``His Infallibility is delirious.’’

Negro bulls have frequently been reported, but the health once proposed by a worthy black is perhaps as good an instance as could be cited.  He pledged ``De Gobernor ob our State!  He come p 27in wid much opposition; he go out wid none at all.’’

Still, in spite of the fact that all nations fall into these blunders, and that, as it has been said of some, Hibernicis ipsis Hibernior, it is to Ireland that we look for the finest examples of bulls, and we do not usually look in vain.

It is in a Belfast paper that may be read the account of a murder, the result of which is described thus:  ``They fired two shots at him; the first shot killed him, but the second was not fatal.’’ Connoisseurs in bulls will probably say that this is only a blunder.  Perhaps the following will please them better:  ``A man was run down by a passenger train and killed; he was injured in a similar way a year ago.’’

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Literary Blunders from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.