was fitly employed to convey the sweetness and richness
of the loveliest poetry that I thought the world had
yet known. After an old fashion of mine, I read
it continuously, with frequent recurrences from each
new poem to some that had already pleased me, and
with a most capricious range among the pieces.
“In Memoriam” was in that book, and the
“Princess”; I read the “Princess”
through and through, and over and over, but I did not
then read “In Memoriam” through, and I
have never read it in course; I am not sure that I
have even yet read every part of it. I did not
come to the “Princess,” either, until
I had saturated my fancy and my memory with some of
the shorter poems, with the “Dream of Fair Women,”
with the “Lotus-Eaters,” with the “Miller’s
Daughter,” with the “Morte d’Arthur,”
with “Edwin Morris, or The Lake,” with
“Love and Duty,” and a score of other
minor and briefer poems. I read the book night
and day, in-doors and out, to myself and to whomever
I could make listen. I have no words to tell
the rapture it was to me; but I hope that in some more
articulate being, if it should ever be my unmerited
fortune to meet that ’sommo poeta’ face
to face, it shall somehow be uttered from me to him,
and he will understand how completely he became the
life of the boy I was then. I think it might
please, or at least amuse, that lofty ghost, and that
he would not resent it, as he would probably have
done on earth. I can well understand why the
homage of his worshippers should have afflicted him
here, and I could never have been one to burn incense
in his earthly presence; but perhaps it might be done
hereafter without offence. I eagerly caught up
and treasured every personal word I could find about
him, and I dwelt in that sort of charmed intimacy with
him through his verse, in which I could not presume
nor he repel, and which I had enjoyed in turn with
Cervantes and Shakespeare, without a snub from them.
I have never ceased to adore Tennyson, though the
rapture of the new convert could not last. That
must pass like the flush of any other passion.
I think I have now a better sense of his comparative
greatness, but a better sense of his positive greatness
I could not have than I had at the beginning; and
I believe this is the essential knowledge of a poet.
It is very well to say one is greater than Keats, or
not so great as Wordsworth; that one is or is not
of the highest order of poets like Shakespeare and
Dante and Goethe; but that does not mean anything of
value, and I never find my account in it. I know
it is not possible for any less than the greatest
writer to abide lastingly in one’s life.
Some dazzling comer may enter and possess it for a
day, but he soon wears his welcome out, and presently
finds the door, to be answered with a not-at-home
if he knocks again. But it was only this morning
that I read one of the new last poems of Tennyson
with a return of the emotion which he first woke in
me well-nigh forty years ago. There has been no
year of those many when I have not read him and loved
him with something of the early fire if not all the
early conflagration; and each successive poem of his
has been for me a fresh joy.