the needs of their fellow-employees who served under them.  The more I had studied the subject the more strongly I had become convinced that an eight-hour day under the conditions of labor in the United States was all that could, with wisdom and propriety, be required either by the Government or by private employers; that more than this meant, on the average, a decrease in the qualities that tell for good citizenship.  I finally solved the problem, as far as Government employees were concerned, by calling in Charles P. Neill, the head of the Labor Bureau; and acting on his advice, I speedily made the eight-hour law really effective.  Any man who shirked his work, who dawdled and idled, received no mercy; slackness is even worse than harshness; for exactly as in battle mercy to the coward is cruelty to the brave man, so in civil life slackness towards the vicious and idle is harshness towards the honest and hardworking.

We passed a good law protecting the lives and health of miners in the Territories, and other laws providing for the supervision of employment agencies in the District of Columbia, and protecting the health of motormen and conductors on street railways in the District.  We practically started the Bureau of Mines.  We provided for safeguarding factory employees in the District against accidents, and for the restriction of child labor therein.  We passed a workmen’s compensation law for the protection of Government employees; a law which did not go as far as I wished, but which was the best I could get, and which committed the Government to the right policy.  We provided for an investigation of woman and child labor in the United States.  We incorporated the National Child Labor Committee.  Where we had most difficulty was with the railway companies engaged in inter-State business.  We passed an act improving safety appliances on railway trains without much opposition, but we had more trouble with acts regulating the hours of labor of railway employees and making those railways which were engaged in inter-State commerce liable for injuries to or the death of their employees while on duty.  One important step in connection with these latter laws was taken by Attorney-General Moody when, on behalf of the Government, he intervened in the case of a wronged employee.  It is unjust that a law which has been declared public policy by the representatives of the people should be submitted to the possibility of nullification because the Government leaves the enforcement of it to the private initiative of poor people who have just suffered some crushing accident.  It should be the business of the Government to enforce laws of this kind, and to appear in court to argue for their constitutionality and proper enforcement.  Thanks to Moody, the Government assumed this position.  The first employers’ liability law affecting inter-State railroads was declared unconstitutional.  We got through another, which stood the test of the courts.