the case, for instance, in the Hellenistic kingdoms,
and in the age of the Caesars. What today is called
by many the emancipation of woman would ultimately
end in the dissolution of the family, and, if carried
out, render poor service to the majority of women.
If man and woman were placed entirely on the same level,
and if in the competition between the two sexes nothing
but an actual superiority should decide, it is to
be feared that woman would soon be relegated to a
condition as hard as that in which she is found among
all barbarous nations. It is precisely family
life and higher civilization that have emancipated
woman. Those theorizers who, led astray by the
dark side of higher civilization, preach a community
of goods, generally contemplate in their simultaneous
recommendation of the emancipation of woman a more
or less developed form of a community of wives.
The grounds of the two institutions are very similar.”
(Roscher’s Political Economy, p. 250.) Note
also that difference in costumes of the sexes is least
apparent among lowly civilized peoples.]—One
of the most striking features in our progress from
barbarism to civilization is the proper adjustment
of the work for men and women. One test of a civilization
is the difference of this work. This is a question
not merely of division of labor, but of differentiation
with regard to sex. It not only takes into account
structural differences and physiological disadvantages,
but it recognizes the finer and higher use of woman
in society.
The attainable, not to say the ideal, society requires
an increase rather than a decrease of the differences
between the sexes. The differences may be due
to physical organization, but the structural divergence
is but a faint type of deeper separation in mental
and spiritual constitution. That which makes
the charm and power of woman, that for which she is
created, is as distinctly feminine as that which makes
the charm and power of men is masculine. Progress
requires constant differentiation, and the line of
this is the development of each sex in its special
functions, each being true to the highest ideal for
itself, which is not that the woman should be a man,
or the man a woman. The enjoyment of social life
rests very largely upon the encounter and play of the
subtle peculiarities which mark the two sexes; and
society, in the limited sense of the word, not less
than the whole structure of our civilization, requires
the development of these peculiarities. It is
in diversity, and not in an equality tending to uniformity,
that we are to expect the best results from the race.
V. Equality of races; or rather a removal of the inequalities,
social and political, arising in the contact of different
races by intermarriage.