such statements might be blunders and not falsehoods—­so convinced was she that her husband’s mind would not act at all times as do the minds of other men.  But having such a conviction she was driven to believe also that almost anything might be possible.  Soames may have been right, or he might have dropped, not the book, but the cheque.  She had no difficulty in presuming Soames to be wrong in any detail, if by so supposing she could make the exculpation of her husband easier to herself.  If villainy on the part of Soames was needful to her theory, Soames would become to her a villain at once—­of the blackest die.  Might it not be possible that the cheque having thus fallen into her husband’s hands, he had come, after a while, to think that it had been sent to him by his friend, the dean?  And if it were so, would it be possible to make others so believe?  That there was some mistake which would be easily explained were her husband’s mind lucid at all points, but which she could not explain because of the darkness of his mind, she was thoroughly convinced.  But were she herself to put forward such a defence on her husband’s part, she would in doing so be driven to say that he was a lunatic—­that he was incapable of managing the affairs of himself or his family.  It seemed to her that she would be compelled to have him proved to be either a thief or a madman.  And yet she knew that he was neither.  That he was not a thief was as clear to her as the sun at noonday.  Could she have lain on this man’s bosom for twenty years, and not yet have learned the secrets of the heart beneath?  The whole mind of the man was, as she told herself, within her grasp.  He might have taken the twenty pounds; he might have taken it and spent it, though it was not his own; but yet he was no thief.  Nor was he a madman.  No man more sane in preaching the gospel of his Lord, in making intelligible to the ignorant the promises of his Saviour, ever got into a parish pulpit, or taught in a parish school.  The intellect of the man was as clear as running water in all things not appertaining to his daily life, and its difficulties.  He could be logical with a vengeance—­so logical as to cause infinite trouble to his wife, who, with all her good sense, was not logical.  And he had Greek at his fingers’ ends—­as his daughter very well knew.  And even to this day he would sometimes recite to them English poetry, lines after lines, stanzas upon stanzas, in a sweet low melancholy voice, on long winter evenings when occasionally the burden of his troubles would be lighter to him than was usual.  Books in Latin and in French he read with as much ease as in English, and took delight in such as came to him, when he would condescend to accept such loans from the deanery.  And there was at times a lightness of heart about the man.  In the course of the last winter he had translated into Greek irregular verse the very noble ballad of Lord Bateman, maintaining the rhythm and the rhyme,