of the tongs is wholly absent from the tongs; and,
therefore, responsibility being absent, punishment
cannot ensue. Am I right?” A hearty burst
of applause was his answer. “Now, then,
we arrive at a man’s stomach. Consider how
exactly, how marvelously, indeed, its situation corresponds
to that of a pair of tongs. Listen—and
take careful note, I beg you. Can a man’s
stomach plan a murder? No. Can it plan a
theft? No. Can it plan an incendiary fire?
No. Now answer me—can a pair of tongs?”
(There were admiring shouts of “No!” and
“The cases are just exact!” and “Don’t
he do it splendid!”) “Now, then, friends
and neighbors, a stomach which cannot plan a crime
cannot be a principal in the commission of it—that
is plain, as you see. The matter is narrowed
down by that much; we will narrow it further.
Can a stomach, of its own motion, assist at a crime?
The answer is no, because command is absent, the reasoning
faculty is absent, volition is absent—as
in the case of the tongs. We perceive now, do
we not, that the stomach is totally irresponsible
for crimes committed, either in whole or in part,
by it?” He got a rousing cheer for response.
“Then what do we arrive at as our verdict?
Clearly this: that there is no such thing in
this world as a guilty stomach; that in the body of
the veriest rascal resides a pure and innocent stomach;
that, whatever it’s owner may do, it at least
should be sacred in our eyes; and that while God gives
us minds to think just and charitable and honorable
thoughts, it should be, and is, our privilege, as
well as our duty, not only to feed the hungry stomach
that resides in a rascal, having pity for its sorrow
and its need, but to do it gladly, gratefully, in
recognition of its sturdy and loyal maintenance of
its purity and innocence in the midst of temptation
and in company so repugnant to its better feelings.
I am done.”
Well, you never saw such an effect! They rose—the
whole house rose—an clapped, and cheered,
and praised him to the skies; and one after another,
still clapping and shouting, they crowded forward,
some with moisture in their eyes, and wrung his hands,
and said such glorious things to him that he was clear
overcome with pride and happiness, and couldn’t
say a word, for his voice would have broken, sure.
It was splendid to see; and everybody said he had
never come up to that speech in his life before, and
never could do it again. Eloquence is a power,
there is no question of that. Even old Jacques
d’Arc was carried away, for once in his life,
and shouted out:
“It’s all right, Joan—give
him the porridge!”
She was embarrassed, and did not seem to know what
to say, and so didn’t say anything. It
was because she had given the man the porridge long
ago and he had already eaten it all up. When
she was asked why she had not waited until a decision
was arrived at, she said the man’s stomach was
very hungry, and it would not have been wise to wait,
since she could not tell what the decision would be.
Now that was a good and thoughtful idea for a child.