the facts brought out by the evidence are stated with perfect fairness, can doubt that the crime of murder was fully brought home to the prisoner.  Such was the opinion of the King who was present during the trial; and such was the almost unanimous opinion of the public.  Had the issue been tried by Holt and twelve plain men at the Old Bailey, there can be no doubt that a verdict of Guilty would have been returned.  The Peers, however, by sixty-nine votes to fourteen, acquitted their accused brother.  One great nobleman was so brutal and stupid as to say, “After all the fellow was but a player; and players are rogues.”  All the newsletters, all the coffeehouse orators, complained that the blood of the poor was shed with impunity by the great.  Wits remarked that the only fair thing about the trial was the show of ladies in the galleries.  Letters and journals are still extant in which men of all shades of opinion, Whigs, Tories, Nonjurors, condemn the partiality of the tribunal.  It was not to be expected that, while the memory of this scandal was fresh in the public mind, the Commons would be induced to give any new advantage to accused peers.360

The Commons had, in the meantime, resumed the consideration of another highly important matter, the state of the trade with India.  They had, towards the close of the preceding session, requested the King to dissolve the old Company and to constitute a new Company on such terms as he should think fit; and he had promised to take their request into his serious consideration.  He now sent a message to inform them that it was out of his power to do what they had asked.  He had referred the charter of the old Company to the Judges, and the judges had pronounced that, under the provisions of that charter, the old Company could not be dissolved without three years’ notice, and must retain during those three years the exclusive privilege of trading to the East Indies.  He added that, being sincerely desirous to gratify the Commons, and finding himself unable to do so in the way which they had pointed out, he had tried to prevail on the old Company to agree to a compromise; but that body stood obstinately on its extreme rights; and his endeavours had been frustrated.361

This message reopened the whole question.  The two factions which divided the City were instantly on the alert.  The debates in the House were long and warm.  Petitions against the old Company were laid on the table.  Satirical handbills against the new Company were distributed in the lobby.  At length, after much discussion, it was resolved to present an address requesting the King to give the notice which the judges had pronounced necessary.  He promised to bear the subject in mind, and to do his best to promote the welfare of the kingdom.  With this answer the House was satisfied, and the subject was not again mentioned till the next session.362