the works of a secretary.”  He accordingly abstains, remains isolated on his manor and leaves to others a task from which he is excluded and which he disdains.  Far from protecting his peasantry he is scarcely able to protect himself or to preserve his immunities.  Or to avoid having his poll-tax and vingtiémes reduced.  Or to obtain exemption from the militia for his domestics, to keep his own person, dwelling, dependents, and hunting and fishing rights from the universal usurpation which places all possessions and all privileges in the hands of “Monseigneur l’intendant” and Messieurs the sub-delegates.  And the more so because he is often poor.  Bouillé estimates that all the old families, save two or three hundred, are ruined.[17] I Rouergue several of them live on an income of fifty and even twenty-five louis, (1000 and 500 francs).  In Limousin, says an intendant at the beginning of the century, out of several thousands there are not fifteen who have twenty thousand livres income.  In Berry, towards 1754, “three-fourths of them die of hunger.”  In Franche-Comté the fraternity to which we have alluded appears in a humorous light, “after the mass each one returning to his domicile, some on foot and others on their Rosinantes.”  In Brittany “lots of gentlemen found as excisemen, on the farms or in the lowest occupations.”  One M. de la Morandais becomes the overseer of an estate.  A certain family with nothing but a small farm “attests its nobility only by the pigeon-house; it lives like the peasants, eating nothing but brown bread.”  Another gentleman, a widower, “passes his time in drinking, living licentiously with his servants, and covering butter-pots with the handsomest title-deeds of his lineage.”  All the chevaliers de Châteaubriand,” says the father, “were drunkards and beaters of hares.”  He himself just makes shift to live in a miserable way, with five domestics, a hound and two old mares " in a chateau capable of accommodating a hundred seigniors with their suites.”  Here and there in the various memoirs we see these strange superannuated figures passing before the eye, for instance, in Burgundy, “gentlemen huntsmen wearing gaiters and hob-nailed shoes, carrying an old rusty sword under their arms dying with hunger and refusing to work."[18] Elsewhere we encounter “M. de Pérignan, with his red garments, wig and ginger face, having dry stone wails built on his domain, and getting intoxicated with the blacksmith of the place;” related to Cardinal Fleury, he is made the first Duc de Fleury.-Everything contributes to this decay, the law, habits and customs, and, above all, the right of primogeniture.  Instituted for the purpose of maintaining undivided sovereignty and patronage it ruins the nobles since sovereignty and patronage have no material to work on.  “In Brittany,” says Châteaubriand, “the elder sons of the nobles swept away two-thirds of the property, while the younger sons shared in one-third of the paternal heritage."[19] Consequently, “the younger