these communications, both as regards style and MS., with those sent to the morning paper, at a previous period, and insisting so vehemently upon the guilt of Mennais.  And, all this done, let us again compare these various communications with the known MSS. of the officer.  Let us endeavor to ascertain, by repeated questionings of Madame Deluc and her boys, as well as of the omnibus driver, Valence, something more of the personal appearance and bearing of the ‘man of dark complexion.’  Queries, skilfully directed, will not fail to elicit, from some of these parties, information on this particular point (or upon others) — information which the parties themselves may not even be aware of possessing.  And let us now trace the boatpicked up by the bargeman on the morning of Monday the twenty-third of June, and which was removed from the barge-office, without the cognizance of the officer in attendance, and without the rudder, at some period prior to the discovery of the corpse.  With a proper caution and perseverance we shall infallibly trace this boat; for not only can the bargeman who picked it up identify it, but the rudder is at hand.  The rudder of a sail-boat would not have been abandoned, without inquiry, by one altogether at ease in heart.  And here let me pause to insinuate a question.  There was no advertisement of the picking up of this boat.  It was silently taken to the barge-office, and as silently removed.  But its owner or employer — how happened he, at so early a period as Tuesday morning, to be informed, without the agency of advertisement, of the locality of the boat taken up on Monday, unless we imagine some connexion with the navy — some personal permanent connexion leading to cognizance of its minute in interests — its petty local news?

“In speaking of the lonely assassin dragging his burden to the shore, I have already suggested the probability of his availing himself of a boat.  Now we are to understand that Marie Rogêt was precipitated from a boat.  This would naturally have been the case.  The corpse could not have been trusted to the shallow waters of the shore.  The peculiar marks on the back and shoulders of the victim tell of the bottom ribs of a boat.  That the body was found without weight is also corroborative of the idea.  If thrown from the shore a weight would have been attached.  We can only account for its absence by supposing the murderer to have neglected the precaution of supplying himself with it before pushing off.  In the act of consigning the corpse to the water, he would unquestionably have noticed his oversight; but then no remedy would have been at hand.  Any risk would have been preferred to a return to that accursed shore.  Having rid himself of his ghastly charge, the murderer would have hastened to the city.  There, at some obscure wharf, he would have leaped on land.  But the boat — would he have secured it?  He would have been in too great haste for such things as securing a boat.  Moreover, in fastening it to the wharf, he would have