At first I was inclined to blame Maggie’s “feeling” on her knowledge that the house was cheap.  She knew it, as she has, I am sure, read all my letters for years.  She has a distrust of a bargain.  But later I came to believe that there was something more to Maggie’s distrust —­as though perhaps a wave of uneasiness, spreading from some unknown source, had engulfed her.

Indeed, looking back over the two months I spent in the Benton house, I am inclined to go even further.  If thoughts carry, as I am sure they do, then emotions carry.  Fear, hope, courage, despair—­if the intention of writing a letter to an absent friend can spread itself half-way across the earth, so that as you write the friend writes also, and your letters cross, how much more should big emotions carry?  I have had sweep over me such waves of gladness, such gusts of despair, as have shaken me.  Yet with no cause for either.  They are gone in a moment.  Just for an instant, I have caught and made my own another’s joy or grief.

The only inexplicable part of this narrative is that Maggie, neither a psychic nor a sensitive type, caught the terror, as I came to call it, before I did.  Perhaps it may be explainable by the fact that her mental processes are comparatively simple, her mind an empty slate that shows every mark made on it.

In a way, this is a study in fear.

Maggie’s resentment continued through my decision to use the house, through the packing, through the very moving itself.  It took the form of a sort of watchful waiting, although at the time we neither of us realized it, and of dislike of the house and its surroundings.  It extended itself to the very garden, where she gathered flowers for the table with a ruthlessness that was almost vicious.  And, as July went on, and Miss Emily made her occasional visits, as tiny, as delicate as herself, I had a curious conclusion forced on me.  Miss Emily returned her antagonism.  I was slow to credit it.  What secret and even unacknowledged opposition could there be between my downright Maggie and this little old aristocrat with her frail hands and the soft rustle of silk about her?

In Miss Emily, it took the form of—­how strange a word to use in connection with her!—­of furtive watchfulness.  I felt that Maggie’s entrance, with nothing more momentous than the tea-tray, set her upright in her chair, put an edge to her soft voice, and absorbed her.  She was still attentive to what I said.  She agreed or dissented.  But back of it all, with her eyes on me, she was watching Maggie.

With Maggie the antagonism took no such subtle form.  It showed itself in the second best instead of the best china, and a tendency to weak tea, when Miss Emily took hers very strong.  And such was the effect of their mutual watchfulness and suspicion, such perhaps was the influence of the staid old house on me, after a time even that fact, of the strong tea, began to strike me as incongruous.  Miss Emily was so consistent, so consistently frail and dainty and so—­well, unspotted seems to be the word—­and so gentle, yet as time went on I began to feel that she hated Maggie with a real hatred.  And there was the strong tea!