who, in violation of the laws of Congress and express treaty provisions, were committing outrages upon the Indians:  The report of the Secretary further states, that the Sacs and Foxes “claimed the right of occupying a part of the country upon Rock river, even after it had been sold to citizens of the United States, and settled by them.”  But the report does not state that under the treaty of 1804, by which these lands were ceded, it is expressly provided that so long as they remain the property of the United States, the Indians of said tribes shall enjoy the privilege of “living and hunting upon them;” it does not state that for six or eight years before the government had sold an acre of land upon Rock river, the white settlers were there, in violation of the laws, trespassing upon these Indians, and thus creating that very hostility of feeling, which, is subsequently cited as a reason for the chastisement inflicted upon them by the United States:  it does not state, that in the year 1829, government, for the purpose of creating a pretext for the removal of the Indians from Rock river, directed a few quarter sections of land, including the Sac village, to be sold, although the frontier settlements of Illinois had not then reached within fifty or sixty miles of that place, and millions of acres of land around it, were unoccupied and unsold:  it does not state that instead of requiring the Indians to remove from the quarter sections thus prematurely sold, to other lands on Rock river, owned by the United States, and on which, under the treaty, they had a right to hunt and reside, they were commanded to remove to the west side of the Mississippi:  it does not state, that the “serious aggressions” and “formidable attitude” assumed by the “British party,” in 1831, consisted in their attempt to raise a crop of corn and beans, in throwing down the fences of the whites who were enclosing their fields, in “pointing deadly weapons” at them and in “stealing their potatoes:”  it does not state that the murder of the Menominie Indians, at Fort Crawford, by a party of the “British band,” was in retaliation, for a similar “flagrant outrage,” committed the summer previous, by the Menominies, upon Peah-mus-ka, a principal chief of the Foxes and nine or ten of his tribe, who were going up to Prairie des Chiens on business and were within one day’s travel of that place:  it does not state that one reason assigned by the “British party” for refusing to surrender the murderers of the Menominies, was the fact that the government had not made a similar demand of that tribe for the murderers of the Sacs:  it does not state that the “hostile attitude” assumed by the Sacs and Foxes, in 1832, after recrossing the Mississippi, and their establishment on Rock river, simply amounted to this; that they came over with their women and children for the avowed purpose of raising a crop of corn with the Winnebagoes—­were temporarily encamped on that stream—­had committed no outrage upon person or property—­and