[77] Disturbances excited by the Scottish colonists in Ulster. [S.]

[78] The subjugation of Scotland by Cromwell. [S.]

[79] That is to say, to interpret Poyning’s law in the spirit in which it was enacted, and give to Ireland the right to make its own laws. [T.  S.]

[80] Free trade and the repeal of the Navigation Act. [T.  S.]

[81] Office-holders should not be absentees. [T.  S.]

[82] That the land laws of Ireland shall be free from interference by England, and the produce of the land free to be exported to any place. [T.  S.]

[83] The laws prohibiting the importation of live cattle into England, and the restrictions as to the woollen industry, were the ruin of those who held land for grazing purposes. [T.  S.]

[84] The Act of 10 and 11 William III., cap. 10, was the final blow to the woollen industry of Ireland.  It was enacted in 1699, and prohibited the exportation of Irish wool to any other country.  In the fifth letter of Hely Hutchinson’s “Commercial Restraints of Ireland” (1779) will be found a full account of the passing of this Act and its consequences. [T.  S.]

[85] Edward Waters and John Harding, the printers of Swift’s pamphlets.  See volume on “The Drapier’s Letters.” [T.  S.]

[86] The text here given is that of the original manuscript in the Forster Collection at South Kensington, collated with that given by Deane Swift in vol. viii. of the 4to edition of 1765. [T.  S.]

[87] The letter was written in reply to a letter received from Messrs. Truman and Layfield. [T.  S.]

[88] Dr. William King, Archbishop of Dublin. [T.  S.]

[89] Swift betrays here a lamentable knowledge of the geography of this part of America.  Penn, however, may have known no better. [T.  S.]

[90] William Burnet, at this time the Governor of Massachusetts, was the son of Swift’s old enemy, Bishop Burnet. [T.  S.]

[91] Burnet quarrelled with the Assembly of Massachusetts and New Hampshire because they would not allow him a fixed salary.  The Assembly attempted to give him instead a fee on ships leaving Boston, but the English Government refused to allow this. [T.  S.]

[92] The original MS. on which this text is based does not contain the passage here given in brackets. [T.  S.]

[93] Swift is here supported by Arthur Dobbs, who in his “Essays on Trade,” pt. ii. (1731) gives as one of the conditions prejudicial to trade, the luxury of living and extravagance in food, dress, furniture, and equipage by the Irish well-to-do.  He describes it “as one of the principal sources of our national evils.”  His remedy was a tax on expensive dress, and rich equipage and furniture. [T.  S.]

[94] The text of this tract is based on that given by Deane Swift in the eighth volume of his edition of Swift’s works published in quarto in 1765. [T.  S.]

[95] This refers to Whitshed. [T.  S.]